An Emotion-Focused Intervention for Glycemic Control in T2D

NCT ID: NCT03553680

Last Updated: 2020-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-20

Study Completion Date

2018-10-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of this proposed project is to collect pilot data using an Emotion-Focused CBT Psycho-social Intervention i individuals with T2D to obtain the effect sizes on hypothesized changes in Negative Emotionality, Diabetes Distress, and HbA1c values that will be needed for a more appropriately sized clinical trial for an RO1 submission to the National Institutes of Health.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our interest in aberrant Emotional Regulation / Emotional Intelligence in Type 2 Diabetes stems from observations that while many patients with Type 2 Diabetes have greater incidence of mood and anxiety (and even anger) disorders than controls, targeting psychiatric conditions, such as depression, is not sufficient to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Thus, the key issue for such patients is not what specific psychiatric disorder they have, but the presence of an impairment in the fundamental regulation of emotional regulation and in how such individuals modulate their emotional response to aversive events in their lives (e.g., emotional intelligence), now suggested by a recent study. As part of a new study, we examined the relationship between glycemic control (HbA1c) and Emotional Experience (ER-Exp) and Skill at Emotional Regulation (ER-Skill) in 100 adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes. We found significant relationships between ER-Exp and ER-Skill and HbA1c levels that accounted for nearly 24% of the variance in HbA1c levels. These relationships with HbA1c levels remained even after accounting for other relevant behavioral variables such as depression/anxiety scores and diabetes self-care/literacy scores. Accordingly, the tendency of an individual to have intense emotional responses (higher scores on ER-Exp), and/or to have a reduced ability to understand/modulate one's emotions in order to cope with daily stresses/threats (lower scores on ER-Skill), may well be linked with poor glycemic control (HbA1c) in adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes. If so, it will be important to develop psycho-social methods to improve ER-Exp and DR-Skill in Type 2 Diabetes patients to determine if one can improve aberrant Emotional Regulation (ER-Exp/ER-Skill), Diabetes Distress (DD), and HbA1c (A1c) levels as suggested by treatment studies showing that such treatment can improve ER-Skill with a sustained reduction in A1c levels in Type 2 Diabetes for up to nine months. Supporting these findings are data from a recent study showing that increasing positive emotion reduces (and increasing negative emotion increases) blood glucose levels, especially in those with poor emotion regulation skills.

Specific Study Objectives:

* Develop an integrated Emotion - Focused Psycho-social EF-CBT) from three (3) existing sources that contain elements to improve ER-Exp and ER-Skill.
* Conduct a pilot study in 10 patients with Type 2 Diabetes with aberrant ER-ER-Exp/ER-Skill and compare treatment outcomes in emotionality, diabetes distress, and in A1c levels with 10 patients with Type 2 Diabetes undergoing treatment as usual (TAU).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Emotion-Focused CBT
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emotion-Focused CBT

Ten CBT sessions with a therapist.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Emotion-Focused CBT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

10 CBT Sessions to improve emotional regulation and emotional intelligence.

Wait List

Three visits for assessments only over the same time period of the Experimental Arm.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Emotion-Focused CBT

10 CBT Sessions to improve emotional regulation and emotional intelligence.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Receiving care for T2D at Kovler Diabetes Center, at UCM, or in the community.
2. Documented diagnosis of T2D for at least one year.
3. Age: 21-65 years of age.
4. HbA1c \> 7.0 (with hemoglobin in the normal range).
5. ER-Exp Screen score of \> 29 and/or ER-Skill Screen score \< 44.
6. Stable medical co-morbid conditions.
7. Able to read English.
8. Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Documented diagnosis of T2D less than one year.
2. Age: \< 21 or \> 65 years of age.
3. HbA1c \< 7.0 .
4. ER-Exp screen score of \< 29 and ER-Skill score =/\> 44.
5. Unstable medical co-morbid conditions.
6. Active psychosis or suicidal/homicidal ideation.
7. Not able to read English.
8. Not able to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emil F Coccaro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-0635

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.