Bipolar Scissors for Circumcision

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

comparing the outcomes of using bipolar scissors for male circumcision to the classic scalpel method

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision

NCT06766838

Prepuce; Accessory

RECRUITING NA

Dilemma of Neonatal Circumcision in Egypt

NCT07076992

Neonate Circumcision

RECRUITING NA

Examination of Short and Long Term Complications of Thermocautery, Plastic Clamping and Surgical Circumcision Techniques

NCT03136224

Circumcision, Male

COMPLETED NA

Unicirc vs Open Surgical Circumcision

NCT02443792

Circumcision, Male

COMPLETED PHASE4

Double Knots Versus Triple Knots Facia Closure Method; is There a Difference in Pain Sensation or Cosmetic Satisfaction?

NCT06303817

Cesarean Section Pain Cosmetics Sensitivity

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective, randomized study, comparing two different techniques for pediatric male circumcision: the bipolar diathermy scissors technique with that of a classic scalpel technique. Study included male infants from 40 days old up to 18 month old. They were reviewed regarding Operative time, bleeding, complications, postoperative pain and morbidity. Differences in the outcome were compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Male Circumcision

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Comparing Outcomes of two different surgical techniques between two groups

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bipolar scissors group

Group of male infants undergoing circumcision using bipolar scissors to separate the foreskin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bipolar scissors

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Classic scalpel group

Group of male infants undergoing circumcision using classic scalpel to separate the foreskin, and sutures to control bleeding

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

classic scalpel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.