Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To investigate whether electrocautery produces a cosmetically inferior surgical scar.
2. To compare the rates of wound infection with each technique.
3. To determine if electrocautery results in less postoperative pain. Our null hypothesis is that electrocautery is equivalent to scalpel for creating skin incisions; with respect to wound cosmesis, wound infection rate, and post-operative pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electrocautery for Safe Skin Incision
NCT05744284
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481
Comparison of the Impact of Electric Scalpels Versus Cold Scalpels
NCT01410175
Cold Knife Versus Monopolar Electrosurgery in Abdominal Incisions
NCT04236401
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electrocautery
Epidermis and dermis incised with cutting setting of electrocautery.
Electrocautery
Electrocautery using cutting mode of epidermis and dermis of skin.
Scalpel
Control, incision of epidermis and dermis with scalpel.
Scalpel
Incising skin (epidermis and dermis) with scalpel.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electrocautery
Electrocautery using cutting mode of epidermis and dermis of skin.
Scalpel
Incising skin (epidermis and dermis) with scalpel.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* bowel resection surgery
* incision is 3cm or larger
Exclusion Criteria
* The site of planned surgery has a previous surgical scar.
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Paul's Hospital, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Carl J Brown
Head, Division of General Surgery, Providence Health Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carl J Brown, MD MSc FRCSC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Providence Health, University of British Columbia
Lisa NF Aird, BSc MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aird LN, Bristol SG, Phang PT, Raval MJ, Brown CJ. Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions. Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):489-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9751. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H11-02242
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.