Interrupted Subdermal Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis
NCT ID: NCT03327922
Last Updated: 2022-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-20
2022-03-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm
NCT03330041
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Cuticular Suture Distance (2mm vs 5mm)
NCT04870008
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481
6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
NCT03303027
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to investigate whether the spacing of the interrupted deep (subdermal) sutures affects surgical wound cosmesis on the trunk and extremities. In other words, the investigator would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: many closely approximated subdermal sutures or fewer, more widely spaced subdermal sutures. The investigator wishes to compare the effects of one versus two centimeter spacing between sutures. It is possible that fewer, more widely spaced sutures may leave more open space in the wound, leaving more tension to pull on those few sutures, possibly encouraging the wound to dehisce and make it harder to approximate the wound edges yielding a less cosmetically appealing scar compared to placing many closely approximated sutures which would decrease the tension and likely better approximate the wound edges yielding a more cosmetically appealing scar. On the other hand, we may find that suture spacing has no effect on wound cosmesis and that placing fewer, more widely spaced sutures is much more time efficient. The investigator may also find that the effect of suture spacing on wound cosmesis is dependent on wound tension. For example, perhaps the suture pacing would have no effect on the cosmesis of a wound under no tension, however, for a wound under high tension, it is possible that many closely approximated sutures would yield better cosmetic results for the reasons listed above.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vicryl absorbable suture placed 2 cm apart
Wound closed with sutures spaced 2 centimeters apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted subdermal suture pattern
Vicryl absorbable suture
Vicryl absorbable suture is a synthetic sterile surgical suture made up of a copolymer
Vicryl absorbable suture placed 1 cm apart
Wound closed with sutures spaced 1 centimeter apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted subdermal suture pattern
Vicryl absorbable suture
Vicryl absorbable suture is a synthetic sterile surgical suture made up of a copolymer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vicryl absorbable suture
Vicryl absorbable suture is a synthetic sterile surgical suture made up of a copolymer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to give informed consent themselves
* Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the trunk and extremities with predicted primary closure
* Willing to return for follow up visit.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to understand written and oral English
* Incarceration
* Under 18 years of age
* Pregnant Women
* Wounds with predicted closure length less than 4 cm
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Davis, Department of Dermatology
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eshagh K, Sklar LR, Pourang A, Armstrong AW, Dhaliwal H, Eisen DB. Interrupted subcuticular suture spacing during linear wound closures and the effect on wound cosmesis: a randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial. Br J Dermatol. 2022 Sep;187(3):318-323. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21625. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1115591
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.