Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure

NCT ID: NCT06448481

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

73 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intra-dermal versus transcutaneous purse-string closures have similar scar cosmesis and post-operative complications. The investigators will use a split wound model, where half of the wound will be closed with intra-dermal purse-string sutures and the other half will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string sutures. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be evaluated via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument, as well as the trace-to-tape method, an objective outcome measure for linear postoperative scars. Any adverse events will also be recorded.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purse-string closure is a versatile technique that utilizes circumferential tissue advancement for partial or complete closure of circular cutaneous surgical defects. First reported in the 1950s for closure of a malar defect, the purse-string closure is now routinely used for umbilical, urethral, and breast defects as well as for cutaneous surgical defects either alone or in conjunction with top sutures, local flaps, or grafts.

Though the purse-string closure was initially described with circumferentially placed intradermal sutures, various modifications to this technique have been published including sub-cuticular, intra-dermal, and cuticular variations. All modifications of the purse-string closure share the advantages of reduced operating time, decreased defect and scar size, no removal of normal tissue, low hematoma risk, and faster healing time. However, several papers suggest that cuticular (transcutaneous) purse-string closures may be superior to intra-dermal purse-string closures due to enhanced hemostasis from greater compression of the dermal vessels, greater utility in atrophic and actinically damaged skin, lower risk of dermal dehiscence, and better efficacy in skin with limited laxity.

In 2015, a randomized trial comparing secondary intention healing to intradermal purse-string closure found similar cosmetic outcomes, scar size and pain level between the intra-dermal purse-string closure and secondary intention healing however similar studies comparing intra-dermal and transcutaneous purse-string closures are lacking. Given the potential functional advantages of the transcutaneous purse-string closure over the intra-dermal purse-string closure, additional studies comparing the two variations of the purse-string closure are needed to guide clinical practice.

The aesthetic outcome and rate of post-operative complications of intra-dermal versus transcutaneous purse-string closures have not been studied. This study seeks to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous purse-string sutures to intra-dermal purse-string sutures by using individuals as their own controls in a split-scar model.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scarring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the POSAS instrument.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intra-dermal purse-string closure on Side A

For all participants, one wound side half will be labeled as A and the other side as B. Side A will be closed with a intra-dermal purse-string closure, and Side B will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intra-dermal purse-string closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are placed below the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and the ends are cinched together like a coin purse.

Transcutaneous purse-string closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are placed through the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and cinched together like a coin purse.

Intra-dermal purse-string closure on Side B

For all participants, one wound side half will be labeled as A and the other side as B. Side B will be closed with a intra-dermal purse-string closure, and Side A will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intra-dermal purse-string closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are placed below the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and the ends are cinched together like a coin purse.

Transcutaneous purse-string closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are placed through the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and cinched together like a coin purse.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intra-dermal purse-string closure

Sutures are placed below the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and the ends are cinched together like a coin purse.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transcutaneous purse-string closure

Sutures are placed through the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and cinched together like a coin purse.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* Able to give informed consent themselves
* Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the head, neck, trunk, or extremities with predicted purse-string closure.
* Willing to return for follow up visit

Exclusion Criteria

* Incarceration
* Under 18 years of age
* Pregnant Women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Eisen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Davis - Dermatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Davis - Dermatology Department

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

John Robb, BS, BA

Role: CONTACT

916-551-2636

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Joo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Omlin K, Kappel ST, Eisen DB. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25372450 (View on PubMed)

Scholl L, Meier NM, Hessam S, Valavanis K, Bechara FG. Subcuticular and cuticular purse-string sutures in dermatologic surgery. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016 Feb;14(2):196-8. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12896. Epub 2016 Jan 20. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26788857 (View on PubMed)

Fioramonti P, Sorvillo V, Maruccia M, Lo Torto F, Marcasciano M, Ribuffo D, Cigna E. New application of purse string suture in skin cancer surgery. Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):893-899. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12941. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29956469 (View on PubMed)

Park S, Oh Y, Lee JW, Choi S, Nam KA, Roh MR, Chung KY. Various Applications of Purse-String Suture and Its Cosmetic Outcome in Cutaneous Surgical Defects. Ann Dermatol. 2023 Apr;35(2):100-106. doi: 10.5021/ad.21.263.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37041703 (View on PubMed)

Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The cuticular purse string suture: a modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;46(7):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03253.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17614809 (View on PubMed)

Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The purse-string suture revisited: a useful technique for the closure of cutaneous surgical wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;46(4):341-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03204.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17442069 (View on PubMed)

Weisberg NK, Greenbaum SS. Revisiting the purse-string closure: some new methods and modifications. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):672-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29160.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12786718 (View on PubMed)

Lam TK, Lowe C, Johnson R, Marquart JD. Secondary Intention Healing and Purse-String Closures. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Oct;41 Suppl 10:S178-86. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000480.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26418684 (View on PubMed)

Raposio E, Antonacci M, Caruana G. A simple technique for the excision of cutaneous carcinoma: the round block purse-string suture. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 20;12:263. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-263.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25142636 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2136552

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Undermining Apices in Surgical Wounds
NCT05758181 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA