Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm

NCT ID: NCT03330041

Last Updated: 2021-05-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-03

Study Completion Date

2018-08-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to investigate whether the spacing of the interrupted cutaneous sutures affects surgical wound cosmesis on the face and neck. In other words, the investigators would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: many closely approximated sutures or fewer, more widely spaced sutures. The investigators wish to compare the effects of two versus five millimeter spacing between sutures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sutures are the standard of care in repairing cutaneous wounds. The majority of surgical reconstructions following a Mohs micrographic surgery and standard surgical excisions require two layers of sutures: a deep (subcutaneous) layer and a top (cutaneous) layer. The deep layer dissolves naturally whereas the top layer may necessitate removal if non-absorbable sutures are used. This study aims to investigate whether the spacing of the interrupted cutaneous sutures affects surgical wound cosmesis on the face and neck. In other words, the investigators would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: many closely approximated sutures or fewer, more widely spaced sutures. The investigators wish to compare the effects of two versus five millimeter spacing between sutures. It is possible that fewer, more widely spaced sutures may leave more open space in the wound, leaving more tension to pull on those few sutures, possibly encouraging the wound to dehisce and make it harder to approximate the wound edges yielding a less cosmetically appealing scar compared to placing many closely approximated sutures which would decrease the tension and likely better approximate the wound edges yielding a more cosmetically appealing scar. On the other hand, the investigators may find that suture spacing has no effect on wound cosmesis and that placing fewer, more widely spaced sutures is much more time efficient. The investigators may also find that the effect of suture spacing on wound cosmesis is dependent on wound tension. For example, perhaps the suture pacing would have no effect on the cosmesis of a wound under no tension, however, for a wound under high tension, it is possible that many closely approximated sutures would yield better cosmetic results for the reasons listed above.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cutaneous Sutures and Scar Cosmesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

At the follow-up visit, two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the physician observer scar assessment score instrument (POSAS).
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fast absorbing gut suture placed 2 mm apart

Wound closed with sutures spaced 2 millimeters apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted cutaneous suture pattern

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fast absorbing gut suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fast absorbing surgical gut suture is a strand of collagenous material

Fast absorbing gut suture placed 5 mm apart

Wound closed with sutures spaced 5 millimeters apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted cutaneous suture pattern

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fast absorbing gut suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fast absorbing surgical gut suture is a strand of collagenous material

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fast absorbing gut suture

Fast absorbing surgical gut suture is a strand of collagenous material

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* Able to give informed consent themselves
* Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the trunk and extremities with predicted primary closure
* Willing to return for follow up visit.

Exclusion Criteria

* Mentally handicapped
* Unable to understand written and oral English
* Incarceration
* Under 18 years of age
* Pregnant Women
* Wounds with predicted closure length less than 4 cm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Eisen, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Davis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Davis, Department of Dermatology

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sklar LR, Pourang A, Armstrong AW, Dhaliwal SK, Sivamani RK, Eisen DB. Comparison of Running Cutaneous Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis of the Face and Neck: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):321-326. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5057.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30649154 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1115596

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Undermining Apices in Surgical Wounds
NCT05758181 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA