Optimal Suture Choice for Improved Scar Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT00938691

Last Updated: 2009-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Certain parts of the body, such as the chest, back, and shoulders, are notorious for producing cosmetically poor scars after cutaneous surgery. While very little research has been done to understand these poor outcomes, it is generally thought that increased tension across the skin inherent to these body areas leads to significant widening of the final scar. Historically, the only way to combat this tension was to support the deeper portion of the wound with sutures that dissolve over several weeks. However, scars take many months to fully develop their greatest strength. So even with the standard technique, wounds in areas of high tension still show spreading of the scar with time. The investigators believe that these wounds require an extended duration of support throughout the scar's maturation period. Until recently, there did not exist a suture that could provide this long duration of support without also carrying the risk of the body rejecting it. Recently, a new extremely long acting absorbable biomaterial has been FDA approved for use as a suture. The investigators plan to use this suture to test the theory that alleviating stress on high tension wounds throughout the period which they gain their maximal integrity produces less scar spread and ultimately better cosmetic outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cicatrix

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tepha

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intradermal Suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vicryl

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intradermal Suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intradermal Suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intradermal Suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients requiring excision of a lesion on chest, back, or shoulders

Exclusion Criteria

* History of ionizing radiation
* History of keloid or hypertrophic scarring
* History of or current internal malignancy
* History of bleeding disorder
* History of collagen or elastin disorder
* Current use of immunosuppressive medications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dallas VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Division of Dermatology

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin F Kia, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dermatology, UT-Southwestern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dallas VA Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kia KF, Burns MV, Vandergriff T, Weitzul S. Prevention of scar spread on trunk excisions: a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jun;149(6):687-91. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.3004.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23752288 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ASDS-45322

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA