Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions

NCT ID: NCT02212977

Last Updated: 2016-10-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis is that incision closure with octylcyanoacrylate is inferior to closure with stitches in Port a Cath patients, who, as a population, are at increased risk for complications. All adult patients who present for initial Port a Cath placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized to either skin incision closure with standard stitches or closure with skin glue. Time to complete skin closure and costs of closure will be compared. Patients will be evaluated approximately one month and three months from the procedure to assess for complications of wound breakdown or infection, as well as for the appearance of the Port a Cath incision.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Port-A-Cath Placement Octylcyanoacrylate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suture

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Octylcyanoacrylate

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Octylcyanoacrylate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Octylcyanoacrylate

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Suture

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Octyl 2-cyanoacrylate 2-octylcyanoacrylate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients (≥18 years) who present for initial implantable port placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who cannot provide informed consent for the procedure will be excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles Kim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00056064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA