Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-11
2019-09-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore the investigators are using two different close techniques for laparoscopic wounds. These are; 1. sutures with steri-strips and 2. adhesive bond.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648
Suture Closure Trial
NCT05261425
Skin Closures at Cesarean Delivery, Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures.
NCT04371549
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
NCT02212977
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
NCT01907542
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suture & steri-strips
4-0 Monocryl
sutures and steri-strips
Adhesive Glue
Adhesive Glue
Adhesive Glue
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
4-0 Monocryl
sutures and steri-strips
Adhesive Glue
Adhesive Glue
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. James's Hospital, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Noel Edward Donlon
General Surgery Specialist Registrar
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. James Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ramjit SE, Davey MG, Keelan S, Herlihy E, Dromey M, Garvey C, Nugent TS, Fawaz A, O'Connell L, Cunningham M, Fahy M, Ryan EJ, Moran B, Aljohmani L, Narayanasamy J, Kelly ME, Healy C, Donohoe C, Ravi N, Neary P, Reynolds JV, Donlon NE. Evaluating the use of absorbable sutures versus sTaples versus tIssue glue in laparoscopic port skin closure (STILS) trial: A prospective, multi-centre randomised clinical trial (RCT). Surgeon. 2025 Oct;23(5):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2025.02.015. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SJH 2019-1.0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.