Aesthetic Outcome of Complex Linear Closure vs Second Intention Healing: Below the Knee
NCT ID: NCT05074212
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
172 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-10
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aesthetic Outcome of Electrodesiccation and Curettage vs Excision With Complex Linear Closure
NCT05074225
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Straight Line and W-plasty Techniques for Linear Wound Closure
NCT05074199
Undermining Apices in Surgical Wounds
NCT05758181
Suture Closure Trial
NCT05261425
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When the decision is made to repair the wound, the majority of wounds are reconstructed using two layers of sutures: a deep (subcutaneous) layer and a top (cutaneous) layer.
This study aims to investigate whether complex linear closure versus second intention healing for cutaneous surgical procedures performed below the knee affects wound cosmesis. In other words, the study team would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: below the knee wound that is closed in a linear fashion or below the knee wound that is left open to heal on its own. The study team also plans to look at quality of life measures via validated surveys and complications.
Randomized control trials comparing these two methods appear to be lacking. A randomized trial looked at second intention healing vs primary simple closure following 4mm or 8mm punch biopsies on the arm, back or thigh1. Besides this study, no other information could be found in the literature on randomized trials comparing linear closure vs second intent for cutaneous wounds below the knee. The study team hopes that this study will provide new insight in cutaneous surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Complex Linear Closure
The study participant will receive two layers of sutures to close the wound.
Factorial Assignment
At the follow-up visit, two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the physician observer scar assessment score instrument (POSAS).
Second Intention Healing
The study participant will not have any sutures placed.
Factorial Assignment
At the follow-up visit, two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the physician observer scar assessment score instrument (POSAS).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Factorial Assignment
At the follow-up visit, two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the physician observer scar assessment score instrument (POSAS).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to give informed consent themselves
* Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure below the knee with a lesion excision diameter of at least 1 cm.
* Willing to return for follow up visit
Exclusion Criteria
* Under 18 years of age
* Pregnant Women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Davis, Department of Dermatology
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1515109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.