Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
NCT ID: NCT01998360
Last Updated: 2018-10-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
NCT01877408
Unicirc vs Open Surgical Circumcision
NCT02443792
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
NCT01688310
Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision
NCT06766838
Evaluating the Efficacy of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) With Four Interrupted Sutures in Adult Male Circumcision
NCT06487494
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (WHO, 2011): "WHO and other health authorities wish to identify one or more devices that (a) would make the VMMC safer, easier, and quicker; (b) would have more rapid healing than current methods and/or might entail less risk of HIV transmission in the post-operative period; (c) could be performed safely by health-care providers with a minimal level of training; and (d) would be cost-effective compared to standard surgical methods for male circumcision scale up."
This quasi-experimental compares the open surgical technique to an alternative minimally-invasive technique using the disposable Unicirc device with tissue adhesive. The controls come from a separate randomized controlled trial (Unicirc 001) that was conducted just prior to the Unicirc 002 case series of 50 subjects. The investigators postulate that VMMC using the Unicirc device meets WHO criteria for the ideal method to scale up: it is an easier technique to learn and perform, requires less intraoperative time, is safer for both surgeons and patients, heals quicker, and is more cost effective than other currently available techniques. The disposable nature of the device is an immense advantage as it eliminates the need to sterilize and can therefore be used in resource-limited settings. It also reduces the chances of infection caused by contaminated instruments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unicirc with tissue adhesive
Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and sealing wound with tissue adhesive
Unicirc with tissue adhesive
Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and wound sealing with tissue adhesive
Surgical control
Surgical circumcision using forceps guided, dorsal slit, or sleeve method
Surgical Control
The study is quasi-experimental, because the open surgical controls are not contemporaneous. They were performed at the same center as part of Unicirc 001 trial with the same conditions as the subsequent 50 Unicirc circumcisions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgical Control
The study is quasi-experimental, because the open surgical controls are not contemporaneous. They were performed at the same center as part of Unicirc 001 trial with the same conditions as the subsequent 50 Unicirc circumcisions.
Unicirc with tissue adhesive
Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and wound sealing with tissue adhesive
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
No anatomical penile abnormalities or infections
Able to provide informed consent to participate
Willing to participate in follow-up visits -
Exclusion Criteria
Penile abnormality or infection which contraindicates or would complicate circumcision
History of bleeding disorder
Past reaction to local anesthetic
\-
18 Years
99 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Simunye Primary Health Care
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Millard
PI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Norman Goldstuck, MB ChB
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Simunye Primary Health Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Simunye Primary Healthcare
Mitchells Plain, Western Cape, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Unicirc 002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.