Study on the Protective Effect of a Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device on Penis After Circumcision
NCT ID: NCT05764889
Last Updated: 2023-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-15
2023-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants and Children
NCT02587208
Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision
NCT06766838
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
NCT01688310
Evaluating the Efficacy of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) With Four Interrupted Sutures in Adult Male Circumcision
NCT06487494
Dilemma of Neonatal Circumcision in Egypt
NCT07076992
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of a flexible sleeve penile protection device on post-circumcision patients in terms of gauze loosening and dislodging, post-operative pain and post-operative bleeding. This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial of patients who underwent circumcision at Peking University Third Hospital from February 2023 to May 2023. Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with this device postoperatively, while patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze postoperatively. Patients were followed up regularly after surgery, and indicators such as complications, pain and recovery time were collected to investigate the protective effect of this device.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device post-operatively.
wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device
Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device post-operatively.
Patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze post-operatively.
Control group
Patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze after operation.
wrapped with traditional gauze
Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device post-operatively.
Patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze post-operatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device
Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device post-operatively.
Patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze post-operatively.
wrapped with traditional gauze
Patients in the experimental group were wrapped with the Flexible Sleeve Penis Protection Device post-operatively.
Patients in the control group were wrapped with traditional gauze post-operatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male patients aged between 12 and 60 years (inclusive).
3. The person or guardian fully understands and signs the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Abnormal blood clotting function.
3. Those who are allergic to the materials used in the manufacture of the product.
4. Patients who are mentally incapable or unable to understand the requirements for participation in the study and have difficulty in cooperating.
5. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are unable to comply with follow-up, compromising the scientific validity and integrity of the study.
12 Years
60 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Liu Zhuo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Liu Zhuo
Attending Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zhuo Liu, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Peking University Third Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mu J, Fan L, Liu D, Zhu D. A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Four Types of Circumcision for Elderly Males with Redundant Prepuce. Urol J. 2020 May 16;17(3):301-305. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4973.
Abara EO. Prepuce health and childhood circumcision: Choices in Canada. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Jan-Feb;11(1-2Suppl1):S55-S62. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4447.
Soltany S, Ardestanizadeh A. The study of the factors affecting the time of ring fall off in circumcision using Plastibell. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2736-2740. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1261_19. eCollection 2020 Jun.
van den Dungen IAL, Rynja SP, Bosch JLHR, de Jong TPVM, de Kort LMO. Comparison of preputioplasty and circumcision in distal hypospadias correction: long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):47.e1-47.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2022628
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.