Comparison Between Different Ventilator Hyperinflation Maneuvers
NCT ID: NCT03631342
Last Updated: 2018-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-18
2018-05-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ventilator Hyperinflation With Increase of Inspiratory Time
NCT03630510
Selecting the Best Ventilator Hyperinflation Settings
NCT03327610
Biomarkers of Lung Injury in Hyperinflation in the Mechanical Ventilator Versus Manual Hyperinflation
NCT03464071
Ventilator Hyperinflation and Manual Rib Cage Compression
NCT03630484
Ventilator Hyperinflation and Hemodynamics
NCT03557645
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
All patients underwent five hyperinflation maneuvers, the order being determined by randomization. Controlled volume ventilation (VCV) at a constant flow rate of 20 Lpm (VCV-20) and 40 Lpm (VCV-40), controlled pressure ventilation (VCV-40) was performed for 2 minutes at 10 minute intervals. PCV), pressure-controlled ventilation associated with inspiratory time adjustment (PCV + Tins) and pressure-supported ventilation (PSV). PEEP and FiO2 were maintained throughout the study.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VCV20
Volume-controlled ventilation mode under constant flow of 20 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the maximum pressure reached 40cmH2O.
VCV20
controlled volume ventilation mode under constant flow of 20 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the Pmax reached 40cmH2O.
VCV40
Volume controlled ventilation mode under constant flow of 40 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the maximum pressure reached 40cmH2O.
VCV40
volume controlled ventilation mode under constant flow of 40 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the Pmax reached 40cmH2O.
PCV
Pressure controlled ventilation mode, inspiratory time of 1 second. The inspiratory pressure was increased every 5 cmH2O, until reaching the maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O.
PCV
controlled ventilation mode, 1 second inspiratory time. The inspiratory pressure was increased every 5 cmH2O, until reaching the maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O.
PCV+Tins
Pressure controlled ventilation mode and inspiratory pressure was increased every 5cmH2O, until the maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O was reached. The inspiratory time was gradually increased until the inspiratory flow reached the baseline. Concomitantly, the respiratory rate was decreased to allow the expiratory flow also to reach the baseline, to avoid self-PEEP.
PCV+Tins
controlled ventilation and inspiratory pressure was increased every 5 cmH2O until the maximum pressure was 40 cmH2O. The inspiratory time was gradually increased until the inspiratory flow reached the baseline. Concomitantly, the respiratory rate was decreased to allow the expiratory flow also to reach the baseline, to avoid self-PEEP.
PSV
Pressure support ventilation mode, with progressive increases of 5 cmH2O at inspiratory pressure, until reaching Pmax of 40 cmH2O. The expiratory sensitivity was adjusted by 25% for all patients.
PSV
ventilatory mode with pressure support, with progressive increases of 5 cmH2O at inspiratory pressure, until reaching Pmax of 40 cmH2O. The expiratory sensitivity was adjusted by 25% for all patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VCV20
controlled volume ventilation mode under constant flow of 20 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the Pmax reached 40cmH2O.
VCV40
volume controlled ventilation mode under constant flow of 40 Lpm. The inspired volume was progressively increased until the Pmax reached 40cmH2O.
PCV
controlled ventilation mode, 1 second inspiratory time. The inspiratory pressure was increased every 5 cmH2O, until reaching the maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O.
PCV+Tins
controlled ventilation and inspiratory pressure was increased every 5 cmH2O until the maximum pressure was 40 cmH2O. The inspiratory time was gradually increased until the inspiratory flow reached the baseline. Concomitantly, the respiratory rate was decreased to allow the expiratory flow also to reach the baseline, to avoid self-PEEP.
PSV
ventilatory mode with pressure support, with progressive increases of 5 cmH2O at inspiratory pressure, until reaching Pmax of 40 cmH2O. The expiratory sensitivity was adjusted by 25% for all patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mechanically ventilated for more than 96 hours through pressure-assisted ventilation (PSV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV)
* Static compliance between 30 and 70 mL/cmH2O
* PEEP between 5 and 8 cmH2O.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-drained pleural effusion or pneumothorax
* Intracranial hypertension
* Bronchospasm
* Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
* Decompensated congestive heart failure
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luciano Matos Chicayban
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
LUCIANO M CHICAYBAN, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Luciano M Chicayban
Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VHI Modality
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.