Colorectal Neoplasia and Microbiota: Does Left Equal Right?
NCT ID: NCT03623152
Last Updated: 2019-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-07
2019-10-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to investigate the microbiome (including bacteriome, virome, and fungome) of adenoma/CRC comparing the left (distal to splenic flexure) vs right side (proximal to splenic flexure) of the colon.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gut Mucosal Microbiota is Associated With Colorectal Cancer Relapse
NCT03385213
Intestinal Flora Differences Between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals
NCT06875648
CARE-CRC: Microbiome Insights and Correlations for Risk and Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer
NCT06734156
Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer Onset and Progression
NCT05368688
A Multi-center Study on Human Microecology Assisted Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer
NCT05998915
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Certain bacterial phyla are more frequently presented in CRC
2. Bacterial diversity is reduced in CRC
3. Co-occurrence of bacterial phyla and exclusion are identified in CRC
4. Besides bacteriome, viromes have been found associated with CRC
5. These changes in the pattern may actually be used for diagnosis and prognosticate purposes.
2. However, there are limitations in most studies and questions remained unanswered
1. Most studies used stool sample and data of tissue (tumor and adjacent normal tissues) may not be available
2. Most studies take adenoma and CRC as one condition, without differentiating the findings according to tumor location
3. Most studies have separate bacteria, virus and fungi. There is a lack of data on their interaction
4. Most studies have identified either microbiome without correlating them with the genomic of the host
3. We know that not all CRC are the same. It has been known that rectal and colonic cancer are not the same. Furthermore, proximal (right) CRC and distal (left) CRC may not be the same.
1. Studies have shown compare to L-CRC, patients with R-CRC are older, more female (Iaocopetta B et al. Int J Cancer 2002)
2. Studies have also shown that the genomic make up of L-CRC and R-CRC are different. R-CRC are more likely to have family cancer syndrome (HNPCC), mostly diploid, less frequent to have loss heterozygosity, less TP53 mutations and more MSI and CIMP, and the gene expression are different (Glebov et al. Cancer Epi, Biomarker and Prevention 2003)
3. The response to therapy might also be different in the L-CRC compare to R-CRC
4. Recent studies show that the clinico-pathological and molecular features of early-onset (\<50 years) CRC varies according to tumor location. (Peres J et al. Am J Cancer Res 2015). In the R-CRC in this group, germline mutation is more common (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM). Adenomas tend to be larger, flatter and more likely to have high-grade dysplasia and villous histology
5. Recent studies have also shown that the clinic-pathological and molecular feature of in the late-onset CRC (70-80 years) varies with tumor location (Brandariz et al. Oncotarget 2018). There are more sporadic MSI, more BRAF mutation and the adenoma/CRC are likely to be mucinous.
4. Studies comparing the microbiome of L-CRC vs R-CRC has not been many. There is some early data showing that the microbiome in the left vs right colon are different.
The aim of this study is to investigate the microbiome (including bacteriome, virome, and fungome) of adenoma/CRC comparing the left (distal to splenic flexure) vs right side (proximal to splenic flexure) of the colon.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. have an indication for a scheduled colonoscopy, either as an investigation of colorectal symptom or as part of a CRC screening
3. for those who are known to have either adenoma or CRC, colonoscopy is arranged for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosectomy (EMR)
Exclusion Criteria
\-
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joseph JY SUNG
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph JY Sung
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese Univeristy of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Fanny Cheung'
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRC MIC L&R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.