Analysis of Intestinal Microflora Combined With DNA Methylation in Stool to Detect Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04302363
Last Updated: 2020-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-01
2021-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods and analysis: In total, 300 patients with positive colonoscopy results and 200 health controls will be recruited. All participants will complete an information form and questionnaires. Fecal samples will be examined by 16S rRNA analysis. Gene methylation levels will be detected in fecal exfoliated cells. Models of related intestinal microbiota and methylation genes will be built. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to select some models with appropriate sensitivity and specificity.The models will be further validated by multicenter studys.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Exploratory Study on Gene Methylation Detection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT07033156
A Stool DNA Test for Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Chinese Community Population
NCT04786704
A Multicenter Clinical Trial of Stool-based DNA Testing for Early Detection of Colon Cancer in China
NCT04722055
DYNAMICS-LYNCH:DNA Methylation Analysis in Stool for Screening of Lynch Syndrome-Associated Colorectal Cancer
NCT06772844
Fecal DNA Methylation Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT04823793
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The 5-year survival rate for people with CRC is 65%. Survival rates for CRC can vary depending on various factors, particularly cancer stage. The 5-year survival rate with localized-stage CRC is 90%. About 39% of patients are diagnosed at this early stage. Because of the lack of typical clinical symptoms, early CRC is difficult to detect, and most patients are already in the advanced stage when CRC is diagnosed, thus missing the best intervention stage. Therefore, early detection and early treatment are effective means to reduce the mortality with CRC. Screening has benefits, including diagnosis at an earlier stage, reduced incidence of CRC and reduced mortality.
At present, the main screening methods for CRC are fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for screening for CRC. However, traditional colonoscopy, an invasive examination method, cannot be widely used in screening for colorectal neoplasia.
Fecal samples are easily obtained.Using feces to screen CRC is the current research consensus. According to the most updated Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for CRC screening,FIT(fecal immunochemical test) is used to select high-risk patients for colonoscopy. FIT has also been widely used in other world regions . The sensitivity of FIT is limited (0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86), and a recent systematic meta-analysis showed wide variation in sensitivity among studies . In addition, race and regional differences may affect test results. Therefore, the early screening methods which is non-invasive, highly sensitive and suitable for Chinese people are needed.
Detection of molecular biomarkers in feces for non-invasive diagnosis of CRC may be a promising alternative to detecting blood/plasma biomarkers in current clinical settings. Abnormalities in the composition of the gut microbiota have been implicated as potentially important causes of CRC. With the widespread use of metagenomic sequencing and pyrosequencing in intestinal microbiota research, more bacteria have been found positively associated with CRC incidence. In a recent study, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to classify microbial communities in human intestinal mucosa at different stages of colorectal tumorigenesis, and Fusobacterium was found enriched in colorectal tumors.
For CRC, the main process of benign polyps becoming malignant tumors is the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that transform colonic epithelial cells into colon adenocarcinoma cells. These cells are continuously shed into colonic lumen and mixed with the stool. During tumor formation, epigenetic changes may occur earlier than mutations. Deregulation of epigenetic mechanisms plays an important role in cancer. Most epigenetic changes in cancer are triggered by genomic alterations in specific genes that are involved in controlling one of the epigenetic mechanisms.Aberrant DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes induces abnormal expression of downstream genes, which is an important step in the process of tumorigenesis.The methylation status of DNA changes during CRC progression. A number of gene methylation abnormalities associated with CRC discovered in recent studies include SFRP2, SEPT9, BMP3, NDRG4, and SPG20. In addition, some gene mutations are related to CRC. For example, TP53 and KRAS mutations are common in CRC.
In previous research the investigators found that SEPT9, NDRG4, and SDC2 had higher frequency and level of methylation in tumors than in normal or non-tumor adjacent CRC tissues, indicating that these methylated genes may have diagnostic potential for CRC screening. However, BMP3 had very limited contribution to detection accuracy in stool samples. Furthermore, the combination of methylated SEPT9, NDRG4, and SDC2 showed high feasibility of detection of CRC and adenoma and further study showed better performance in detecting CRC than adenoma. Our research also demonstrates differences in fecal genes between different ethnic groups.
This research aims to detect intestinal microbiota differences in stool by 16S rRNA analysis between CRC patients and healthy controls. It will combine DNA analysis of fecal exfoliated cells to further clarify this difference to build some models for screening early colorectal cancer in Chinese people. At the same time, the research will also study the impact of Chinese eating habits on Intestinal Microflora.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Healthy controls must be 18-75 years old with no tumors and no history of cancer.
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Test Group
Inclusion criteria in the experimental group are age 18-75 years old, colonoscopy revealing colon or rectal tumor, biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenoma, no chemotherapy or surgery, and no history of other cancer. Both groups must be able to understand and be willing to sign informed consent.
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Fecal microbiota detection and exfoliated cell gene detection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* no chemotherapy or surgery, and no history of other cancer.
* must be able to understand and be willing to sign informed consent.
* Healthy controls don't have tumors and history of cancer.
Exclusion Criteria
* People whose stool samples does not meet the requirements.
* People who are unwilling to sign written informed consent or follow a research protocol.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
UNKNOWN
WEIDONG LIU,MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
WEIDONG LIU,MD
Director of day surgery center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
weidong Liu, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
mingmei Liao, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
xi Xie, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
jie Chen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
zhan Qu, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1490-1502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Varghese C, Shin HR. Strengthening cancer control in China. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(5):484-5. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70056-7. No abstract available.
Wang YX, Zhu N, Zhang CJ, Wang YK, Wu HT, Li Q, Du K, Liao DF, Qin L. Friend or foe: Multiple roles of adipose tissue in cancer formation and progression. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Dec;234(12):21436-21449. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28776. Epub 2019 May 3.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;103(6):1541-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x. Epub 2008 May 13.
Sung JJ, Lau JY, Young GP, Sano Y, Chiu HM, Byeon JS, Yeoh KG, Goh KL, Sollano J, Rerknimitr R, Matsuda T, Wu KC, Ng S, Leung SY, Makharia G, Chong VH, Ho KY, Brooks D, Lieberman DA, Chan FK; Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2008 Aug;57(8):1166-76. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.146316.
Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S, Levin TR, Corley DA. Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):171. doi: 10.7326/M13-1484.
Liang Q, Chiu J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Higashimori A, Fang J, Brim H, Ashktorab H, Ng SC, Ng SSM, Zheng S, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Yu J. Fecal Bacteria Act as Novel Biomarkers for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):2061-2070. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1599. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
Carmona FJ, Azuara D, Berenguer-Llergo A, Fernandez AF, Biondo S, de Oca J, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Salazar R, Villanueva A, Fraga MF, Guardiola J, Capella G, Esteller M, Moreno V. DNA methylation biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013 Jul;6(7):656-65. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0501. Epub 2013 May 21.
Maleszewska M, Wojtas B, Kaminska B. Deregulation of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer. Postepy Biochem. 2018 Oct 15;64(2):148-156. doi: 10.18388/pb.2018_125.
Park SK, Baek HL, Yu J, Kim JY, Yang HJ, Jung YS, Choi KY, Kim H, Kim HO, Jeong KU, Chun HK, Kim K, Park DI. Is methylation analysis of SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters suitable for colorectal cancer screening in the Korean population? Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):495-501. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.495. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, Weiss G, Schuster M, Distler J, Steiger KV, Grutzmann R, Pilarsky C, Habermann JK, Fleshner PR, Oubre BM, Day R, Sledziewski AZ, Lofton-Day C. Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem. 2009 Jul;55(7):1337-46. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115808. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
Melotte V, Lentjes MH, van den Bosch SM, Hellebrekers DM, de Hoon JP, Wouters KA, Daenen KL, Partouns-Hendriks IE, Stessels F, Louwagie J, Smits KM, Weijenberg MP, Sanduleanu S, Khalid-de Bakker CA, Oort FA, Meijer GA, Jonkers DM, Herman JG, de Bruine AP, van Engeland M. N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4 (NDRG4): a candidate tumor suppressor gene and potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 1;101(13):916-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp131. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
Okada S, Hata K, Kawai K, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Sasaki K, Kaneko M, Emoto S, Murono K, Nozawa H. Association between KRAS G13D mutations and anastomotic recurrence in colorectal cancer: Two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(12):e14781. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014781.
Zeng N, Xiang J. Detection of KRAS G12D point mutation level by anchor-like DNA electrochemical biosensor. Talanta. 2019 Jun 1;198:111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.105. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Chen J, Sun H, Tang W, Zhou L, Xie X, Qu Z, Chen M, Wang S, Yang T, Dai Y, Wang Y, Gao T, Zhou Q, Song Z, Liao M, Liu W. DNA methylation biomarkers in stool for early screening of colorectal cancer. J Cancer. 2019 Aug 28;10(21):5264-5271. doi: 10.7150/jca.34944. eCollection 2019.
Rasmussen L, Wilhelmsen M, Christensen IJ, Andersen J, Jorgensen LN, Rasmussen M, Hendel JW, Madsen MR, Vilandt J, Hillig T, Klaerke M, Munster AM, Andersen LM, Andersen B, Hornung N, Erlandsen EJ, Khalid A, Nielsen HJ. Protocol Outlines for Parts 1 and 2 of the Prospective Endoscopy III Study for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: Validation of a Concept Based on Blood Biomarkers. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Sep 13;5(3):e182. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6346.
Liu S, Wen L, Hou J, Nie S, Zhou J, Cao F, Lu Q, Qin Y, Fu Y, Yu X. Predicting the pathological response to chemoradiotherapy of non-mucinous rectal cancer using pretreatment texture features based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Aug;44(8):2689-2698. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02032-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCRS-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.