A Stool DNA Test for Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Chinese Community Population

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

12106 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-22

Study Completion Date

2022-06-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

to determine screening value of stool-based SDC2 DNA methylation test for advanced colorectal neoplasia in the asymptomatic Chinese community population.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Stool DNA-based SDC2 and SFRP2 Methylation Test in China

NCT04515082

Colorectal Neoplasm Colorectal Cancer Adenomatous Polyps +3 more

UNKNOWN

Multiple Screening Methods for the Detection of Chinese Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer

NCT03411707

Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Adenomatous Polyp

UNKNOWN

Stool-based SDC2 DNA Methylation Test for the Detection of Colorectal Advanced Adenomatous Polyps and Cancer

NCT04221854

Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Adenomatous Polyp Screening

UNKNOWN NA

An Exploratory Study on Gene Methylation Detection of Colorectal Cancer

NCT07033156

CRC (Colorectal Cancer) Adenoma Colon

RECRUITING

Multitarget Stool FIT-DNA Study for Colorectal Cancer Early Screening in China

NCT04287335

Colorectal Cancer Adenomatous Polyps Adenoma +1 more

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In China, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains to be the leading cancer of the digestive system. According to nationwide cancer statistics using population-based cancer registry data in China, age-standardized incidence rate of CRC and age-standardized mortality rate increased significantly from 2000 to 2015. It induces a substantial financial burden in terms of healthcare utilization and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) lost. Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBT) and colonoscopy have been proposed as the main primary screening modalities for asymptomatic subjects by international guidelines and Asia Pacific Consensus Statements. Nevertheless, shortage and uneven distribution of colonoscopy resources combined with huge population base consisted of the current situation in China. Previous population-based CRC screening programs usually employed questionnaires and/or FOBT to assess high-risk groups and recommended colonoscopy. This algorithm faced difficulties such as complex traditional questionnaires, low colonoscopy adherence, and a high false-positive rate. When the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic further limited the implementation of colonoscopy, the contradictions developed more acute.

A Hong Kong group had designed and validated a colorectal cancer risk scoring system based on age, gender, smoking history, and family history through the results of screening in 11 Asia-Pacific cities. The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score was more concise and divided the population into three categories: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. Compared with the low-risk population, the probability of advanced colorectal neoplasia in intermediate-risk and high-risk population increased by 2.6 times and 4.3 times respectively. Because of simplicity and efficiency, it was recommended by Asia-Pacific screening guidelines and several guidelines in China. Another APCS related multi-center study indicated that by selecting high-risk subjects and low/average-risk subjects with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colonoscopy, the colonoscopy workload could be reduced by 50% compared with the strategy of primary colonoscopy in those same subjects. All these experiences deserved to be drawn on during the post-pandemic era.

The recent decade has witnessed a rapid development of non-invasive biomarkers to detect CRC. Stool DNA(sDNA) Testing is a novel screening test for CRC, using molecular techniques to identify CRC-relevant biomarkers in stool. One of its toolkits, Multitarget Stool DNA Testing (FIT-DNA), was first approved by the FDA in 2014 for its application in clinical practice, which has been widely promoted in the United States. Subsequently, it was endorsed by multiple societies as one of the recommended screening tests.

Recently, a stool test of methylated Syndecan-2(SDC2) has been developed as a fecal-DNA product targeted to improve the diagnostic accuracy of CRC screening. A meta-analysis of previous clinical studies reporting the accuracy of stool DNA methylation tests in detecting CRC included 46 studies totaling 16,149 patients. The most accurate single gene was found to be SDC2 with a pooled sensitivity of 83.1% (72.6%, 90.2%) and a specificity of 91.2% (88.6%, 93.2%). A recent study involving 1,110 subjects from 2017 to 2018 by three Chinese tertiary hospitals assessed the performance of the SDC2 sDNA test. The sensitivity of the SDC2 sDNA test was 301/359 (83.8%) for CRC, 16/38 (42.1%) for advanced adenomas, and 134/154 (87.0%) for early-stage CRC (stage I-II), while maintaining a specificity of 699/713 (98.0%). Nevertheless, there were limitations in the design of these original studies. For instance, most involved small, hospital-based CRC cases and controls that might not fill the knowledge gap between population screening. Additional clinical trials are required to further validate its diagnostic accuracy in other populations, especially community-setting.

Potential participates would be recruited via community public communication. The subjects would be asked to fill in a concise questionnaire obtained through a public WeChat account after informed consent. Basic information would be acquired while APCS score and correspondent risk categories would be calculated automatically. After sampling education, stool collection devices of sDNA and quantitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT) would be distributed to all subjects. Two samples of stool from single defecation would be requested to put into the two collection devices according to instructions respectively by the subjects themselves at home.

Efforts would be made by the public WeChat account and the community staff to urge samples recover from subjects as quickly as possible (prefer within 24h after defecation). Community staff would deliver the samples qualified in the initial evaluation to the standardized laboratory for testing as quickly as possible. If APCS be evaluated high-risk or any of qFIT or sDNA tests positive, the risk of the subject would be considered increased. Colonoscopy would be strongly recommended, and priority and rapid arrangement would be made in the corresponding center. For subjects with low/intermediate-risk APCS and negative qFIT and sDNA, the project team also encourages the subjects to accept colonoscopy on the basis of a clear understanding of benefits and risks. We would help to arrange colonoscopy as early as possible.

All colonoscopy examinations will be performed by experienced endoscopists while monitoring quality of colonoscopy (bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate and withdrawal time). Full-time recording personnel would be arranged to follow up and record the relevant information of colonoscopy. For the subjects diagnosed with colorectal cancer, the postoperative diagnosis and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of the subjects would be retrieved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Neoplasm Advanced Adenoma Adenoma Serrated Lesion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stool-based SDC2 DNA methylation test

A diagnostic device measuring syndecan 2(SDC2) methylation status in stool DNA to detect colorectal cancer

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

quantitative Fecal immunochemical test

A diagnostic device using immunoturbidimetric methods to measure fecal hemoglobin concentration

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

COLOSAFE OC-Sensor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Asymptomatic screening individual (no alarm features predicting colorectal cancer including hematochezia, melena, anemia of unknown cause, weight loss, abdominal mass, a positive result of digital rectal examination)
2. Age between 45 to 75 years old, the gender is not limited
3. Willing to participate and sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with contraindications for bowel preparation or colonoscopy
2. Patients with known colorectal adenoma or serrated lesions
3. History of colonoscopy within 5 years or polypectomy
4. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
5. History of CRC and patients clinically highly suspected with colorectal cancer
6. History of hereditary CRC syndrome (including polyposis)
7. Patients taking anticoagulants such as aspirin and warfarin within 7 days, or who have coagulopathy
8. Pregnancy, or severe organ insufficiency (heart, lung, or kidney et al)

Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes