DYNAMICS-LYNCH:DNA Methylation Analysis in Stool for Screening of Lynch Syndrome-Associated Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06772844
Last Updated: 2025-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-01-10
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Around 30% of CRC cases have a hereditary component, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome. Lynch syndrome, or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), accounts for 3%-5% of CRC cases. Early diagnosis, screening, and prophylactic surgery can reduce CRC mortality by 7%-42%, and mortality from endometrial and ovarian cancers by 1%-6%. Intensive screening is essential for Lynch syndrome patients, who are at high risk for CRC.
Due to the lack of early symptoms, many CRC cases are diagnosed in later stages, causing financial strain on patients, families, and society. Screening is an effective tool in reducing CRC-related mortality by more than 50%. In developed countries such as the U.S., U.K., and Japan, CRC screening is integrated into public health programs, emphasizing its role in prevention.
In China, CRC screening mainly involves the fecal occult blood test followed by colonoscopy, but this method faces challenges. First, the fecal occult blood test lacks sufficient sensitivity, leading to underdiagnosis. Second, colonoscopy is invasive with low patient acceptance. It also requires specialized facilities, advanced equipment, and skilled endoscopists, limiting its accessibility. Given China's large population and limited healthcare resources, universal colonoscopy screening is challenging, resulting in low screening rates.
To address these challenges, we propose replacing part of colonoscopy screening with DNA methylation testing of fecal samples. Self-sampling methylation screening could ease the strain on healthcare resources and improve patient compliance. By combining methylation screening with colonoscopy, we aim to reduce colonoscopy frequency and enhance overall compliance.
This study will include three rounds of methylation screening with colonoscopy as the control, involving 400 Lynch syndrome patients. The goal is to develop new screening criteria for this high-risk group, reduce colonoscopy frequency, and ultimately lower CRC incidence in Lynch syndrome patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome Based on Next-generation Sequencing in Colorectal Cancer
NCT03047226
Analysis of Intestinal Microflora Combined With DNA Methylation in Stool to Detect Colorectal Cancer
NCT04302363
Early Diagnosis and Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer
NCT06991452
An Exploratory Study on Gene Methylation Detection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT07033156
A Multicenter Clinical Trial of Stool-based DNA Testing for Early Detection of Colon Cancer in China
NCT04722055
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Due to the lack of early symptoms, many CRC patients are diagnosed at the middle to late stages of the disease, which places significant financial pressure not only on the patients themselves but also on society and their families. Screening is one of the most effective tools for preventing colorectal cancer and can reduce mortality by more than 50%. In developed countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, colorectal cancer screening has been integrated into public health programs, highlighting its critical role in disease prevention. Currently, colorectal cancer screening relies on the fecal occult blood test, followed by detailed examinations such as colonoscopy in our country, which still presents several challenges. First, the sensitivity of the fecal occult blood test is insufficient, leading to a high rate of underdiagnosis. Second, colonoscopy is an invasive procedure with relatively low acceptance among patients. Furthermore, colonoscopy is typically performed in a facility-based setting, which requires advanced endoscopic equipment and experienced endoscopists, making it highly dependent on medical resources. Given the limited healthcare resources, achieving universal coverage of the entire population with a facility-centered colonoscopy model is challenging, resulting in a low overall screening rate. Improvements are needed to enhance the efficiency and coverage of screening programs to better prevent and control the incidence of CRC. For patients with Lynch syndrome, intensive colonoscopy may lead to poor compliance due to its tedious process. To address these challenges, we propose to replace part of the colonoscopy screening with DNA methylation testing for fecal samples. Self-sampling methylation screening for colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome could not only alleviate the excessive strain on healthcare resources but also improve patient compliance with screening.
To explore the optimal screening strategy, reduce the frequency of colonoscopy, and improve patient compliance, we propose conducting methylation screening alongside colonoscopy for patients with Lynch syndrome. This study will include three consecutive rounds of head-to-head methylation screening, with colonoscopy as the control, involving 400 patients with Lynch syndrome. We aim to identify new screening criteria for this high-risk group, reduce the frequency of colonoscopy, improve screening compliance, and ultimately reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer in these patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with lynch syndrome
Patients diagnosed with Lynch syndrome by genetic testing
fecal DNA methylation testing
Three rounds of screening were performed. In the first year, colonoscopy was conducted along with concurrent fecal DNA testing performed prior to the colonoscopy. In the second year, fecal DNA testing was performed only if no polyps were detected during the colonoscopy in the first year; otherwise, both colonoscopy and fecal DNA testing were conducted. In the third year, a colonoscopy was performed with concurrent fecal DNA testing conducted before the procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fecal DNA methylation testing
Three rounds of screening were performed. In the first year, colonoscopy was conducted along with concurrent fecal DNA testing performed prior to the colonoscopy. In the second year, fecal DNA testing was performed only if no polyps were detected during the colonoscopy in the first year; otherwise, both colonoscopy and fecal DNA testing were conducted. In the third year, a colonoscopy was performed with concurrent fecal DNA testing conducted before the procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pei-Rong Ding
director
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-FXY-142
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.