Movement Improvement After Paediatric Armeo®Spring Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT03552614
Last Updated: 2020-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
43 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-04-20
2018-05-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In recent years, robotic rehabilitation has become an important tool to promote functional recovery in patients with CP and ABI, thanks to its ability to promote high intensity, repetitive, engaging training. Moreover, it has additional advantages that can contribute to the understanding of the effectiveness of these devices in motor learning and recovery. It has indeed higher resolution and inter -rater and intra-rater reliability with respect to standard assessment methods (i.e. clinical scales). Furthermore, it is able to provide a quantitative evaluation of patients' movement during treatments instead of relying exclusively on qualitative observation. Recently, Merlo and co-workers (Sol et Salus, Rimini, Italy) developed and validated a tool to extract indices of accuracy, velocity and smoothness from the analysis of 3D trajectories of the end point of the robotic exoskeleton Armeo®Spring (Hocoma, CH).
The primary aim of the study is to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in children affected by congenital and acquired brain damages by means of funcional scales and quantitative assessment of movement performance (accuracy, velocity and smoothness).
Patients affected by acquired or congenital brain disease are enrolled. The inclusion criteria are: age between 5 and 18; the ability to handle objects in daily life within levels I, II, and III, according to the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS); the ability to understand and follow test instructions. Conversely, the exclusion criteria are: severe muscle contracture and/or spasticity, a diagnosis of severe learning disabilities or behavioral problems and visual or hearing difficulties that would impact on function and participation.
Participants undergo the standard intervention protocol followed at the IRCCS E. Medea. It is composed by 20 sessions with Armeo®Spring and 20 sessions of physiotherapy, within 1 month. Patients are evaluated before (T0) and after (T1) the intervention with the Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST) and the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function. During the first, tenth and last training session, patients executed the "Vertical Capture" exergame, which assess patient's functional level during a task that involves elbow flex-extension and shoulder flex- extension and abd-adduction. From these evaluation sessions, quantitative indices of movement performance (precision, velocity and smoothness) are extracted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program in Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT00473447
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Action Observation Training in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
NCT03256357
The Use of Armeo Spring in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
NCT02636205
Action Observation in Children With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
NCT05223257
The Effect of Combined Armeospring and CIT on Neuro-motor and Functional Recovery in Children With Unilateral CP
NCT02914925
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
children with brain damage
Patients undergo physiotherapy + Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation
Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation
Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation is performed with Armeo®Spring. It is a passive exoskeleton with five degrees of freedom that guarantees passive arm weight support with springs.
The treatment was composed by 45 minutes of robotic training (5 times a week for 4 weeks) during which patients performed a customized pull of exergames.
physiotherapy
Patients undergo 45-minute treatment sessions 5 times a week for 4 weeks of physiotherapy, focused on gross and fine motor ability to promote independence in daily activities, and it is customized on patients' need.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation
Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation is performed with Armeo®Spring. It is a passive exoskeleton with five degrees of freedom that guarantees passive arm weight support with springs.
The treatment was composed by 45 minutes of robotic training (5 times a week for 4 weeks) during which patients performed a customized pull of exergames.
physiotherapy
Patients undergo 45-minute treatment sessions 5 times a week for 4 weeks of physiotherapy, focused on gross and fine motor ability to promote independence in daily activities, and it is customized on patients' need.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the ability to understand and follow test instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
* diagnosis of severe learning disabilities or behavioral problems
* visual or hearing difficulties that would impact on function and participation
5 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sol et Salus Hospital, Rimini, Italy
UNKNOWN
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emilia Biffi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea
Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frascarelli F, Masia L, Di Rosa G, Cappa P, Petrarca M, Castelli E, Krebs HI. The impact of robotic rehabilitation in children with acquired or congenital movement disorders. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;45(1):135-41.
Turconi AC, Biffi E, Maghini C, Peri E, Servodio Iammarone F, Gagliardi C. Can new technologies improve upper limb performance in grown-up diplegic children? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Oct;52(5):672-681. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
Colombo R, Cusmano I, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Sep;22(5):1020-9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2306571. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
Merlo A, Longhi M, Giannotti E, Prati P, Giacobbi M, Ruscelli E, Mancini A, Ottaviani M, Montanari L, Mazzoli D. Upper limb evaluation with robotic exoskeleton. Normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smoothness. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):523-30. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130998.
Longhi M, Merlo A, Prati P, Giacobbi M, Mazzoli D. Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jun 8;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0163-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
05/2018-Oss
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.