Effects of the Use of Multi Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) on Decision Quality in an Online Delphi
NCT ID: NCT03498365
Last Updated: 2021-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
385 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-15
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Protocol Lab for Online Trial Delphi and Question Effects
NCT03498677
Computerized Contraceptive Decision Aid
NCT01479985
Impact of a Decision Aid Regarding Natural Health Products for Menopausal Symptoms
NCT00325923
Checklist-guided Shared Decision-making for Code Status Discussions in Medical Inpatients.
NCT03872154
DECIdE, Shared DECIsion in hEalth : the Real-life Impact Study
NCT06052917
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The embedded trial was considered after the building of a database of existing online trials and conducting a descriptive analysis" Creating a database of Internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis, followed by the completion of a systematic overview of systematic overviews, "Patient and Public Involvement in Clinical Trials Design: An Overview of Systematic Reviews" and followed this with an analysis of "Self-Management Open Online Trials in Health"(In review). The results included a lack of standardization, insufficient guidance for implementation and significant research reporting weaknesses. Decision-making support tools may improve decision quality.
This embedded trial will be implemented in an online Delphi to come to the consensus about what declarations and methods to include when building a participatory online trials protocol.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Online MCDA
MCDA
Experimental decision support
Online Delphi
Delphi
Standard support
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MCDA
Experimental decision support
Delphi
Standard support
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
OTHER
ThinkWell
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amy Price
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amy I Price, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oxford
Mike J Clarke, DPhil
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen's University, Belfast
Mette Kjer Kaltoft, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Syddansk Universitet
Jack Dowie, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Oxford
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Brice A, Price A, Burls A. Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis. Digit Health. 2015 Nov 20;1:2055207615617854. doi: 10.1177/2055207615617854. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
Dowie J, Kjer Kaltoft M, Salkeld G, Cunich M. Towards generic online multicriteria decision support in patient-centred health care. Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):689-702. doi: 10.1111/hex.12111. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Kaltoft MK, Dowie J, Turner R, et al. Decisional equipoise is not decisional conflict: avoiding the false clarity bias in the evaluation of decision aids and Shared Decision Making processes. F1000Research 2015;4. doi:10.7490/F1000RESEARCH.1110671.1
Kaltoft M, Cunich M, Salkeld G, Dowie J. Assessing decision quality in patient-centred care requires a preference-sensitive measure. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Apr;19(2):110-7. doi: 10.1177/1355819613511076. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLOT-D MCDA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.