Mixed Methods Study Web-based Life Support Decision Aid
NCT ID: NCT03271658
Last Updated: 2018-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-01
2017-01-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Communication During Hospitalization About Resuscitation Trial
NCT02984124
Improving Shared-Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit Using Patient-reported Outcome Information
NCT05155150
Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Life-sustaining Therapies
NCT04034979
Achieving Patient-Centered Care and Optimized Health In Care Transitions by Evaluating the Value of Evidence
NCT02354482
A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Video Images in Advance Care Planning in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients
NCT01325519
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Questionnaires, patient/family/physician discussions and web based tool viewing will be completed in a hospital setting. The investigator will administer pre-intervention questionnaires to the participants, which will take approximately 15 minutes. Participants will then be randomized to groups, and be invited to use the web based eLSDA or usual care materials on a laptop computer or tablet (30 minutes). This will be followed by post-intervention questionnaires in a second interview (15 minutes). Physicians and nurses/social workers will be asked to complete a survey to examine the barriers to discussions about goals of care (15 minutes). The investigator will also fill out the chart abstraction tool after the participants give consent.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Patient/family are randomized to either the active intervention (web based life support patient decision aid - eLSDA and decision coaching) or usual care comparison.
Web based life support patient decision aid
The web-based life support decision aid (eLSDA) was adapted from a print-based decision aid. The eLSDA includes information on the pros and cons of both life support and comfort care. The eLSDA lays out the decision about life support for an individual patient/family in a logical stepwise fashion to permit discussion, ask questions, and permit reflection on each step. At the end of the eLSDA, unmet decision-making needs are identified to seek support from the healthcare team.
Decision coaching
During the interactive process of using the eLSDA, the study nurse provides decision coaching for patient/family, specifically a facilitated values clarification exercise.
Usual Care Comparison
Patients may also randomized to review current web based resources provided by the health region for seriously ill patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Web based life support patient decision aid
The web-based life support decision aid (eLSDA) was adapted from a print-based decision aid. The eLSDA includes information on the pros and cons of both life support and comfort care. The eLSDA lays out the decision about life support for an individual patient/family in a logical stepwise fashion to permit discussion, ask questions, and permit reflection on each step. At the end of the eLSDA, unmet decision-making needs are identified to seek support from the healthcare team.
Decision coaching
During the interactive process of using the eLSDA, the study nurse provides decision coaching for patient/family, specifically a facilitated values clarification exercise.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 55 + with one or more of the following diseases:
1. Chronic obstructive lung disease
2. Congestive heart failure
3. Cirrhosis
4. Cancer
5. End-stage dementia
6. Renal failure
* Any patient 70 + admitted to the hospital from the community because of an acute medical or surgical condition.
* Any patient 55 - 69 years of age admitted to the hospital, who has high likelihood of death in the next 6 months, in the opinion of the treating physician.
Exclusion Criteria
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
OTHER
University of Saskatchewan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anh Pham
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Kryworuchko, PhD RN CNCC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Wanda Martin, PhD RN
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Saskatchewan
Donna Goodridge
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Saskatchewan
Petrina McGrath
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Saskatoon Health Region
Karen Levesque
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Saskatoon Health Region
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
The Change Foundation. Consumers and Canadian Health Care Trending Analysis 2004. The Change Foundation: Toronto. 2005.
Heyland DK, Groll D, Rocker G, Dodek P, Gafni A, Tranmer J, Pichora D, Lazar N, Kutsogiannis J, Shortt S, Lam M; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). End-of-life care in acute care hospitals in Canada: a quality finish? J Palliat Care. 2005 Autumn;21(3):142-50.
Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A. Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.010. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Decide Together Survey - Life Support Decision Aid
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BEH12334
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.