Protocol Lab for Online Trial Delphi and Question Effects
NCT ID: NCT03498677
Last Updated: 2021-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
385 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-29
2019-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of the Use of Multi Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) on Decision Quality in an Online Delphi
NCT03498365
How Frequently and in What Format Are Research Trial Results Disseminated to Participants (ResponseQT)
NCT03021863
The Role of Supplementary Material in Journal Articles QT
NCT02961036
Online Education Intervention to Reduce Ageism Among Undergraduate Students
NCT04570917
Online Mindful Self-Compassion Training for Medical Students: an Exploratory Feasibility Study
NCT06538597
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Protocol Lab for Online Trials-Delphi (PLOT-D) study will use an online Delphi combined with participatory action research to inform the development of a multi-use protocol template for writing protocols for self-recruited online trials of interventional self-management. The Protocol lab will use the Delphi findings, along with earlier research to redesign a series of protocols for online randomized trials with the aim of providing support for citizens to work alongside researchers to build participatory health trials online.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Method of presentation one
presentation order
section presentation one
Method of presentation two
alternative presentation order
section presentation two
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
presentation order
section presentation one
alternative presentation order
section presentation two
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ThinkWell
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amy Price, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oxford
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ThinkWell
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brookes ST, Chalmers KA, Avery KNL, Coulman K, Blazeby JM; ROMIO study group. Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2405-6.
Potter S, Brookes ST, Holcombe C, Ward JA, Blazeby JM. Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery. Trials. 2016 Sep 23;17(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1591-y.
Snow R, Crocker JC, Crowe S. Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting. Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 4;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0007-6. eCollection 2015.
Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.
Fletcher AJ, Marchildon GP. Using the Delphi Method for Qualitative, Participatory Action Research in Health Leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2014;13:1-18
Brice A, Price A, Burls A. Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis. Digit Health. 2015 Nov 20;1:2055207615617854. doi: 10.1177/2055207615617854. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
Bagley HJ, Short H, Harman NL, Hickey HR, Gamble CL, Woolfall K, Young B, Williamson PR. A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress. Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLOT-D Question Effects
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.