Multifaceted Online Interventions to Increase Clinicians Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions
NCT ID: NCT02038439
Last Updated: 2015-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
908 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search" (MPFS), an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. However additional barriers need to be overcome for clinicians to actually search and use this evidence in their practice. Theses include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).
This randomized trial seeks to test 3 innovative online interventions among clinicians registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions. These interventions build on effective models for the teaching of clinical skills at the point of care, so that clinicians are facilitated in using the search engine as a clinical tool, and perceive evidence retrieval skills as true clinical skills.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Increasing Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions
NCT02240095
Do Clinicians Want Recommendations?
NCT02006017
An Interactive Patient-Centered Consent for Research Using Medical Records
NCT03063268
An E-health Letter Intervention for Caregivers
NCT05882461
The Effect of Remote Treatment on Medical Provider Creative Thinking and Patient Disclosure
NCT06784635
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One main barrier to achieving evidence-informed care by clinicians is lack of quick and easy identification, appraisal and synthesis of current best evidence. Clinicians' information needs are considerable - but about 3000 articles are published in Medline every day. Numerous evidence-based resources have been developed to filter and process the evidence, but although increasingly used by clinicians, each offer a fragmented and scattered view of information, and none provides comprehensive topic coverage or satisfactory updating.
To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search (MPFS)", an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. MPFS provides both alerts to users about new research in their chosen disciplines, and a novel federated search function, with the particular feature of organizing information according to the "pyramid of evidence-based resources", with the most clinically applicable evidence at the top. Thus MPFS simultaneously retrieves evidence from Studies ("Medline", both filtered and unfiltered, at the bottom), then Systematic reviews; Synopses of studies and systematic reviews (selected for methodological rigor and clinical relevance), and, at the top level, online widely used Summaries (e.g."Best Practice").
Combining features of the current best evidence-based resources is not enough to increase access and use of current best evidence, as shown by the relatively low utilization of searching features among the hundreds of clinicians currently registered at McMaster University and using the alerting system. Additional well-known barriers that need to be overcome include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions, and simplicity of using one single albeit limited resource), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence and limits of other single resources, lack of knowledge and experience of what federated searches can offer, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).
2. Hypothesis
This trial seeks to test 3 innovative online interventions among clinicians registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions. These interventions build on effective models for the teaching of clinical skills at the point of care, so that clinicians are facilitated in using the search engine as a clinical tool, and perceive evidence retrieval skills as true clinical skills.
3. Methods
1. Study design: Randomized Factorial Controlled Trial.
2. Setting and Participants: The trial will be conducted among postgraduate and faculty MD registered in MPFS and working in the teaching hospitals and clinics of McMaster University (see eligibility criteria below)
3. Participating clinicians will be randomized to 3 online interventions (see description below) in a factorial design (A x B x C), whose permutation results in 8 allocation arms (A+B+C, A+B, A+C, B+C, A, B, C, no intervention, see details below)
4. Randomization: will be computer-generated, stratified training level (post-graduate MD, faculty MD), and baseline frequency of searching for evidence on MPFS. Registrants will be randomly allocated to each study arms. Allocation will be concealed from research staff.
5. Blinding and control group: Although participants cannot be blinded to the interventions, they will not be told of the different features offered, and all will receive usual searching features of MPFS.
6. Primary and secondary outcomes (see below).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventions: A + B + C
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered all 3 online interventions combined:
* Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
* Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
* Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Interventions A + B
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered the 2 following interventions combined:
* Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
* Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Interventions A + C
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:
* Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
* Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Interventions B + C
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:
* Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
* Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Intervention A alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered only the following intervention:
\* Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Intervention B alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered only the following intervention:
\* Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Intervention C alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, clinicians will be offered only the following intervention:
\* Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
No intervention
In this arm, clinicians will be offered non of the 3 online interventions, but will just be using the usual features of the search engine available to all users.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Clinicians allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* and working in the teaching hospitals and clinics of the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Exclusion Criteria
* Registrants that never logged in MPFS during the last 12 months counting back from the beginning of the trial.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Agoritsas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seguin A, Haynes RB, Carballo S, Iorio A, Perrier A, Agoritsas T. Translating Clinical Questions by Physicians Into Searchable Queries: Analytical Survey Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Apr 20;6(1):e16777. doi: 10.2196/16777.
Agoritsas T, Iserman E, Hobson N, Cohen N, Cohen A, Roshanov PS, Perez M, Cotoi C, Parrish R, Pullenayegum E, Wilczynski NL, Iorio A, Haynes RB. Increasing the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions: protocol and intervention design of the MacPLUS FS Factorial Randomized Controlled Trials. Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 20;9:125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0125-9.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
online MPFS search engine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FRN86465
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.