Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
299 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Information Prescriptions on Medication Adherence in Emergency Department (ED) Patients
NCT01174706
An Interactive Patient-Centered Consent for Research Using Medical Records
NCT03063268
Effects of a Personalized Web-based Antenatal Care Planner
NCT00182325
Showing Health Information Value in a Community Network
NCT00365885
The Usefulness of Patients Receiving Their Own Letter After an Outpatient Attendance
NCT00129636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To that end, our specific aims are:
1. To evaluate the impact of IRx on patients. We are performing a randomized clinical trial, comparing IRx with standard provision of information. The primary outcome is patient satisfaction.
2. To evaluate the impact of IRx on providers. As part of the trial, provider perceptions and behavior will be assessed.
3. To evaluate the impact of IRx on the health-care system. As part of the trial, costs entailed and resources utilized will be assessed.
4. To evaluate how IRx generalizes across service environments. The trial will be performed in two environments: adult breast cancer and neonatal intensive care.
At the heart of this proposal are the randomized clinical trials. In each, patients in both intervention and control groups will receive standard clinical care in their clinic visits. Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive information services from a specially trained librarian; patients in the control groups will receive routine, current information provision. For Aim 1, immediately after their clinic visits and four weeks later, all participants will report their satisfaction on a survey that include measures of patient-provider communication. For Aim 2, participating providers are surveyed for their perceptions of information needs being met and about patient-provider interaction. For Aim 3, costs of care and costs of providing the IRx environment will be tabulated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Information Services (IRx)
Information services tailored to the needs of individual patients. The information prescription (IRx)or service is defined for this study as a combination of: 1)An evidence-based web site for use by patients and their families; 2) A reference interview and assistance in locating relevant general information in response to patient information needs; 3) Documentation of the questions and the information service provided in response to these in the patient's Electronic Patient Record for review by providers as needed; and, 4) Triage of patient's/parents clinical questions to providers.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Neonatal Intensive care:Biological mothers (or consenting guardians) of premature infants born and admitted or transferred in to Johns Hopkins Hospital or Bayview Medical Center neonatal intensive care units.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neonatal Intensive Care: Parents with infants whose SNAP mortality \>= 80%(J Pediatr. 2001 Jan;138(1):92-100)
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
NIH
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nancy K Oliver, MLS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Kathleen B Oliver, MLS, MPH
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JHU 04-09-03-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.