The Effect of Informative Letters on the Prescription and Receipt of Schedule II Controlled Substances

NCT ID: NCT02345434

Last Updated: 2021-11-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1525 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fraud and waste is estimated to cost the American health care system nearly $200 billion each year, and the public Medicare and Medicaid programs about $60 billion each year. This study will evaluate a new method for fighting fraud: mailing informative letters to outlier providers to notify them of their aberrant behavior. These letters are targeted at high prescribers of schedule II controlled substances in Medicare Part D. The investigators will look at the effects of these letters on the behavior of providers and their patients. These effects are of substantial policy interest as they suggest how to best design anti-fraud policies. They are also of academic interest, shedding light on the behavior of physicians and their patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Economics Fraud Delivery of Health Care Health Expenditures Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No informative letter

This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Informative letter

This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Informative letter

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Informative letter

The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Comparative billing report Peer activity report

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Outlier with respect to the count of schedule II prescription drug events relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013
* Outlier with respect to the 30-day equivalent prescriptions of schedule II substances relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013

Exclusion Criteria

\- Deceased
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

General Services Administration (GSA)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy Finkelstein, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/525

American Economic Association Randomized Controlled Trials Registry Entry

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JPAL-LETTERS-SII

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id