Precision Feedback to Improve Health Care Quality

NCT ID: NCT05923463

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-06

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This cluster-randomized trial will assess the effectiveness of a precision feedback service on anesthesia provider performance. The precision feedback service enhances a standard audit and feedback (A\&F) email with a brief message and visual display about high-value performance information. The control arm will receive a standard "one size fits most" A\&F email that is currently sent to anesthesia providers each month. Hypothesis: Providers receiving precision feedback will increase a) care quality for improvable measures and b) email engagement (click-through and dashboard login rates) when compared with providers receiving standard A\&F emails. The study investigators will assess unintended consequences in a mixed-methods process evaluation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Care Quality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

precision-enhanced feedback email messages

Providers receive an enhanced monthly email containing precision audit and feedback (A\&F).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

precision-enhanced feedback email messages

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Providers receive customized messages prioritizing metrics in an optimal formatting.

standard feedback email messages

Providers receive the standard "one size fits most" A\&F monthly email.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard feedback email messages

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Providers receive metrics in a common format.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

precision-enhanced feedback email messages

Providers receive customized messages prioritizing metrics in an optimal formatting.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

standard feedback email messages

Providers receive metrics in a common format.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participation in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) provider feedback email program.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ended participation in the MPOG provider feedback email program for any reason during the study period
* Changed professional roles (e.g. transitioned from resident to attending) before the end of the intervention period
* Changed institutions during the study period
* Had no institution-selected quality measures in common between the pre-intervention and intervention period
* Were not candidates to receive a precision feedback email for the majority of the trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Library of Medicine (NLM)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zach Landis-Lewis

Assistant Professor of Learning Health Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zach Landis-Lewis

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Landis-Lewis Z, Flynn A, Janda A, Shah N. A Scalable Service to Improve Health Care Quality Through Precision Audit and Feedback: Proposal for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 10;11(5):e34990. doi: 10.2196/34990.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35536637 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01LM013894-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

HUM00194224

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop
NCT05381441 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Health Disparities on the Labor Floor
NCT04633824 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Guideline Adherence for Heart Health
NCT00224848 COMPLETED PHASE2