Comparisons of Two Types of Armeo Robot for Upper Extremities
NCT ID: NCT03465267
Last Updated: 2018-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-01
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Armeo Power Robot Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
NCT06708065
Comparisons of Two Types of Rehabilitation Robot for Upper Extremities
NCT03104881
Comparisons of Two Types of Robot Assisted Gait Training
NCT03341065
The Effect of Application of Proximal and Distal Upper Rehabilitation Robot With Stroke Patients
NCT04054700
Quantified Analysis of Neuronal Recovery Using Myelin Imaging After Robot Assisted Upper Arm Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT04651322
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thus the results from this study might suggest usefulness of motorized robot.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Armeo power
Armeo power robot for upper extremity
Armeo power
Intervention with Armeo power rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which provide assistive force.
The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.
Armeo spring
Armeo spring robot for upper extremity
Armeo spring
Intervention with Armeo spring rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which is operated only by participants, without any assistive force from robot.
The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Armeo power
Intervention with Armeo power rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which provide assistive force.
The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.
Armeo spring
Intervention with Armeo spring rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which is operated only by participants, without any assistive force from robot.
The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Onset ≥ 3 months
* 26 ≤ Fugl-Meyer Assessment score ≤ 50
* 3 ≤ Shoulder or elbow MRC scale ≤ 4
* Shoulder or elbow flexor spasticity modified ashworth scale ≤ 1+
* Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator
Exclusion Criteria
* Fracture of affected upper limb
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joon-Ho Shin
Team manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joon-Ho Shin, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Rehabilitation Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Rehabilitation Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Joon-Ho Shin, MS
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Park JH, Park G, Kim HY, Lee JY, Ham Y, Hwang D, Kwon S, Shin JH. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 19;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NRC-2017-01-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.