Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms

NCT ID: NCT02878746

Last Updated: 2021-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators developed a real-time 2-axis mirror robot system as a simple add-on module for conventional mirror therapy using a closed feedback mechanism, which allows for real-time movement of the hemiplegic arm. The investigators conduct a case study for stroke patients with a two-dimensional mirror robot for 30 min per day for two weeks (10 sessions). For the conventional mirror therapy group, the investigators prepared the tasks for fine motor training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators conduct a case study for stroke patients with a two-dimensional mirror robot for 30 min per day for two weeks (10 sessions). For the conventional mirror therapy group, the investigators prepared the tasks for fine motor training. These tasks included more complicated tasks so that the participants would be interested in the tasks without the robot system.

Before and after 10 sessions of the therapy, the investigators conduct functional evaluations: the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale of the upper extremity (FMA-UE), the modified Ashworth scale, the modified Barthel index of upper extremity (MBI-UE: personal hygiene, bathing, feeding, and dressing), and the Jebsen hand function test, hand power measurement, and hemispatial neglect test (line bisection test and Albert's test) with the same occupational therapist. The motor evoked potential was measured for the patients without the history of brain surgery or seizure.

The investigators selected a thumb finding test (TFT) among various tools for assessing proprioception, because TFT is widely used and reliable. The TFT can be assessed, after confirming normal proprioception in the unaffected arm, by the patient touching the nose with their eyes closed while the examiner lifts the affected arm to eye level. The patient is then asked to grasp the thumb of the affected hand with the unaffected hand, and this is repeated. The examiner then places a hand over the patient's eyes and raises the patient's affected hand to well above the patient's head. The patient is then asked to grasp the thumb as before.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic mirror therapy

For 30 min per day for two weeks (10 sessions)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic mirror therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

2-dimensional

Conventional mirror therapy

For 30 min per day for two weeks (10 sessions)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional mirror therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

2- and 3-dimensional

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic mirror therapy

2-dimensional

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional mirror therapy

2- and 3-dimensional

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Over 18 years old
* Supratentorial stroke diagnosed between 4 months and 6 years ago
* Upper-limb hemiplegia with Medical Research Council grade 2 or less.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe spasticity with modified Ashworth scale of grade 3 or more;
* Mini-mental state examination score less than 12
* Global or sensory aphasia.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sun Gun Chung

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hamzei F, Lappchen CH, Glauche V, Mader I, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Functional plasticity induced by mirror training: the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):484-96. doi: 10.1177/1545968311427917. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22247501 (View on PubMed)

Pandian JD, Arora R, Kaur P, Sharma D, Vishwambaran DK, Arima H. Mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke (MUST trial): a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2014 Sep 9;83(11):1012-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000773. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25107877 (View on PubMed)

Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):209-17. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324786. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19074686 (View on PubMed)

Thieme H, Bayn M, Wurg M, Zange C, Pohl M, Behrens J. Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke--a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Apr;27(4):314-24. doi: 10.1177/0269215512455651. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22960240 (View on PubMed)

Bhasin A, Padma Srivastava MV, Kumaran SS, Bhatia R, Mohanty S. Neural interface of mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurol India. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):570-6. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.105188.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23287316 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNUH-1209-051-425

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation
NCT01253018 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2