RCT- LMA Supreme™ Versus the Spritztube® Tracheal Cannula in Anesthetized Adult Patients

NCT ID: NCT03443219

Last Updated: 2018-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

355 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-15

Study Completion Date

2017-10-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study compares the LMA Supreme™ versus the Spritztube® tracheal cannula in anesthetized adult patients.

The current randomized study is designed to assess the success placement of blind insertion using LMA Supreme™ , in comparison with the Spritztube® tracheal cannula.

In addition, time, number of attempts, easy insertion and the number of complications at insertion and removal will be assessed.

The investigators hypothesize that the LMA Supreme™ versus the Spritztube® tracheal cannula will similarly perform during anesthetized adult patients despite differences in their structural design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A new extraglottic airway device, the Spritztube® \[tracheal cannula, Med Europe s.r.l\], was developed combining the ability to perform both EAD ventilation and oro-tracheal fibreoptic intubation using the same device. The Spritztube® consists of a silicone cannula with two low-pressure cuffs: a proximal cuff, designed to seal the pharynx cranially of the epiglottis and a distal cuff, designed to seal the oesophagus. The positioning of this device requires the aid of a spindle, that keep the cuffs on the same line and it is rigid enough to allow the passage through oropharynx tissue. That can be inserted blindly as extraglottic device or through the use of direct laryngoscopy or fibroscopy as tracheal cannula.

The current randomized study is designed to assess the success placement of blind insertion using LMA Supreme™ , in comparison with the Spritztube® tracheal cannula.

In addition, time, number of attempts, easy insertion and the number of complications at insertion and removal will be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
opening a sealed envelope, provided by an independent physician blinded to patient's allocation In addition, outcome assessor were blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spritztube®

The patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers.In Spritztube® group, Spritztube® was inserted into each patient after anesthesia induction.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spritztube®

Intervention Type DEVICE

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl,Spritztube® was inserted and both cuffs inflated

LMA Supreme™

The patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers.In vgroup, LMA Supreme™was inserted into each patient after anesthesia induction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LMA Supreme™

Intervention Type DEVICE

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl,LMA Supreme™ was inserted and both cuffs inflated

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spritztube®

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl,Spritztube® was inserted and both cuffs inflated

Intervention Type DEVICE

LMA Supreme™

After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl,LMA Supreme™ was inserted and both cuffs inflated

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I, II, and III;
* Age \> 18 years
* Elective surgery in the supine position

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Age \<18 years
* Not eligibility for surgery
* Predicted difficult airway management
* Positive history for esophageal or pharyngeal diseases
* Emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Bortolo Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Silvia De Rosa

Medical Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Raffaele Bonato, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Rosa S, Messina A, Sorbello M, Rigobello A, Colombo D, Piccolo A, Bonaldi E, Gennaro P, Urukalo V, Pellizzari A, Bonato R, Carboni SC. Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme vs. the Spritztube tracheal cannula in anaesthetised adult patients: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;36(12):955-962. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001106.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31644512 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29/16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.