Development and Validation of the Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale in Patients With Periodontal Problems
NCT ID: NCT03436537
Last Updated: 2018-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-02
2017-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients.
The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Nutritional Habits, Oral Hygiene, Relationship Between Dental Caries and Periodontal Condition
NCT06129357
The Impact of Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy on Patients' Halitosis, Taste Perception, and Smell Sensation
NCT06063460
Changes in Periodontal Pocket Depth After Periodontal Treatment
NCT07327658
Effects Of Different Periodontal Treatments On Quality Of Life In Patients With Periodontitis
NCT06539364
Evaluation of Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on Patient's Self Perception of Esthetics
NCT06477510
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: With patient interviews were identified a total of 22 statements that describe the non-aesthetic gingival appearance. These 22 items were reviewed by the dentists and then Periodontologists and the number of items in the survey was reduced to 7. Subsequently, three groups of patients were included in the study: Gingival recession (GR) group, gingival enlargement (GE) group and periodontal healthy (H) group. Consequently, the validity and reliability of the periodontal aesthetic perception scale (PAPS) were examined.
Results: According to the results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 1 item was removed from the scale. The final 6-item questionnaire was shown to have a two-domain structure. Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was .766. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) values were between 0.98 and 1.00, demonstrating excellent agreement. Overall, these findings indicated that the PAPS has good reliability.
Conclusion: This reliable, valid and short questionnaire specific to aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems may serve as a valued instrument in future clinical trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gingival recession (GR) group
GR group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Gingival enlargement (GE) group
GE group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.
Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
periodontal healthy (H) group
H group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.
Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
-The presence of gingival enlargement (Grade 0, I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
Exclusion Criteria
* The precence of the psychological or systemic disease
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ozge Gokturk
asst. assoc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ozge Gokturk
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Study Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gaziosmanpasa University
Tokat Province, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-KAEK-131
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.