Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit

NCT ID: NCT03344445

Last Updated: 2018-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

simple compare of information gain between traditional visit and video-assisted visit
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

traditional vist

Patients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

video-assisted

Patients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

video-assisted pre anesthesia explain

Intervention Type OTHER

Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

video-assisted pre anesthesia explain

Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch

Department of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Li Kuei Chen, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17972617 (View on PubMed)

Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15920209 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

102-019-E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.