Tracheal Intubation With the Rigid Tube for Laryngoscopy- a New Method

NCT ID: NCT03341507

Last Updated: 2021-04-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the efficiency of the rigid tube for laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in patients with presumed difficult airway and compare the classical laryngoscopy and this method in matter of glottis visualisation and tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The rigid tube for laryngoscopy is a 15 to 30 cm long metallic tube with a bevel end and a diameter of 0.5-2.0 cm , an instrument used to inspect the larynx and surrounding areas. It resembles a rigid bronchoscope but it is shorter. When in use, it has to be attached to a light source.

The hypothesis of the study stands that the rigid tube for laryngoscopy could be more efficient in tracheal intubation for difficult airway patients when the classical intubation with a curved blade laryngoscope is unsatisfactory.

The retromolar approach in both sides together with bougie(intubating tube introducer) intubation is the technique of intubation used in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation;Difficult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A group of patients with difficult airway criteria will be intubated using the rigid tube for laryngoscopy. A classical laryngoscopy with a McIntosh laryngoscope will be performed prior intubation and the Cormack-Lehane grade of glottis visualisation will be noted. If the Cormack -Lehane grade of glotic visualisation 2b, 3 or 4, the intubation maneuvre is carried further with the rigid tube. If the Cormack-Lehane glottic visualisation grade is less than 2b (1 or 2a) the intubation is accomplished with the MacIntosh laryngoscope (conventional laryngoscope) and the patient is excluded from the study from that point further.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Tracheal intubation with the rigid tube for laryngoscopy for patients with difficult airway. Prior the use of rigid tube for laryngoscopy, a classical laryngoscopy with a McIntosh laryngoscope will be performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

classical laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

the laryngoscopy with the McIntosh laryngoscope performed prior the use of rigid tube and the Cormack-Lehane glottis visualisation noted.

rigid tube for laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

the view of glottis achieved with the rigid tub for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with an elastic gum bougie performed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

classical laryngoscopy

the laryngoscopy with the McIntosh laryngoscope performed prior the use of rigid tube and the Cormack-Lehane glottis visualisation noted.

Intervention Type DEVICE

rigid tube for laryngoscopy

the view of glottis achieved with the rigid tub for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with an elastic gum bougie performed

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

laryngoscopy with McIntosh curved blade laryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with criteria of anatomically difficult airway from SARI (The Simplified Airway Risk Index Scale) parameters analysis
* patients with airway pathology which predicted difficult intubation: tumors or cervical masses, previous radiotherapy or surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* stridor or marked laryngeal or tracheal stenosis, vocal cords polyps
* emergency surgery, decompensated cardiac or pulmonary disease
* grade 1 and 2a at classical laryngoscopy after Cormack- Lehane Classification
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marchis Ioan Florin

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ioan Florin Marchis, Md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu- Cluj Napoca, Romania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cluj County Emergency Hospital- ENT Clinic

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Romania

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Norskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Lundstrom LH. Incidence of unanticipated difficult airway using an objective airway score versus a standard clinical airway assessment: the DIFFICAIR trial - trial protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2013 Oct 23;14:347. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-347.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24152537 (View on PubMed)

Rutter JM, Murphy PG. Cormack and Lehane revisited. Anaesthesia. 1997 Sep;52(9):927. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9349093 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MIFlorin

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.