Investigating the Neural Correlates in Memory Retrieval After HD-tDCS

NCT ID: NCT03319134

Last Updated: 2020-08-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-18

Study Completion Date

2020-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall objective of this study is to investigate the neural correlate in retrieval memory task.

The aim of the study is to understand the undergoing changes in late positive ERP component during retrieval memory task when stimulating the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) with High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Retrieval memory is supported by distinct retrieval process known as recollection and familiarity. These two process have been associated with distinct event related potentials (ERPs). At the time of retrieval, familiarity is associated with modulation of the FN400, an enhanced positivity for old items relative to new items observed from approximately 400-600ms post stimulus onset. The FN400 tends to have mid-frontal scalp distribution which can extend to left and right frontal areas and central midline regions. In contrast, recollection has been linked with modulation of positive going waveform that emerges approximately 600ms post stimulus and is typically maximal over parietal sites and referred to as late positive component (LPC). In addition, FN400 is found to increase gradually as a function of item retrieval confidence whereas LPC is limited to high confidence retrieval response.

High Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS ) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique. Compared to the standard bipolar montage used by the conventional tDCS, it uses arrays of smaller, specially designed electrodes to deliver a constant and low current directly to the cortical brain areas to increase the spatial focality. Studies show that the cortical area undergoing stimulation with HD-tDCS is more restricted compared to the standard bipolar montage of conventional tDCS. Moreover, tDCS has been proposed as a therapeutic procedure in various diseases and tDCS in healthy adults have demonstrated to improve cognitive and memory performance, but information regarding the effects of HD-tDCS targeting the PCC and its impact on memory retrieval is scarce. By targeting the PCC area by HD-tDCS, we want to introduce a safer, easier-to-use and more accurate non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. The dysfunctions of posterior cingulate cortex hav been linked to a range of psychiatric and neurological condition such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, autism, depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as aging. It shows increased activity when subject retrieve autobiographical memories suggests its internal orientated function. PET and ERP combined studies have shown greater blood flow medial temporal lobe with a brief late positive ERP component in PCC. Therefore, in this study we aim to understand whether HD-tDCS targeting the PCC can modulate the late positive ERP component.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Adults

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) active HD-tDCS with retrieval memory task, (2) sham HD-tDCS with retrieval memory task, (3) active cathodal HD-tDCS with retrieval memory task
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

active anodal HD-tDCS

Active anodal HD-tDCS stimulation applied during memory task

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

active anodal HD-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

1\) active anodal HD-tDCS with memory task

sham HD-tDCS

Sham HD-tDCS stimulation during memory task for comparison

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham HD-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

2\) sham HD-tDCS with memory task

active cathodal HD-tDCS

Active cathodal HD-tDCS stimulation applied during memory task

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

active cathodal HD-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

3\) active cathodal HD-tDCS with memory task

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

active anodal HD-tDCS

1\) active anodal HD-tDCS with memory task

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham HD-tDCS

2\) sham HD-tDCS with memory task

Intervention Type DEVICE

active cathodal HD-tDCS

3\) active cathodal HD-tDCS with memory task

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Native English Speaker
* Currently not using any medication
* Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe disease
* Mental illness
* Cardiac history
* History of severe head injuries
* History of epileptic seizures
* Any implanted devices such as pacemaker, neurostimulator
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Texas at Dallas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sven Vanneste

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sven Vanneste

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas at Dallas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas at Dallas

Richardson, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.