Identifying Effective Approaches to Counseling on Firearm Safety

NCT ID: NCT03272048

Last Updated: 2018-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-06

Study Completion Date

2018-04-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Each year in the United States (U.S.), over 40,000 individuals die by suicide, and approximately half of these deaths occur by intentional, self-inflicted gunshot wounds. Given these staggering statistics, efforts to minimize individuals' access to firearms during at-risk periods has been identified as a critical if fraught suicide prevention strategy. Among individuals at risk for suicide who present to clinical settings, a crucial component of the clinical management of suicide risk is to ask about firearm ownership/access and counsel on firearm safety (e.g., encourage an at-risk person to transfer the firearm to a loved one until risk abates). Despite the clinical, ethical, and in some cases legal mandate of this intervention, a substantial proportion of clinicians are woefully undertrained and therefore unprepared to manage suicide risk and appropriately deliver counseling on firearm safety. Clinical and empirical evidence suggests that even among patients identified to be at increased risk for suicide, few clinicians ask about firearms or provide counseling on firearm safety. One key reason for this fissure between recommendations and actual implementation of recommendations is that strategies for discussing firearm safety in a way that is impactful and yields patient adherence to recommendations have yet to be established.

One common approach to attempt to garner pro-health behavior change is the use of fear appeals; however, research on the utility of this approach across non-firearm-related health interventions has been equivocal. Given the cultural importance placed on firearms in the U.S., the investigators contend that fear-based approaches to lethal means counseling may be counter-productive by creating defensive avoidance, thereby detracting from the purpose of counseling on firearm safety (i.e., patient safety).

Further, patient adherence to recommendations to limit access to a firearm during at-risk periods may be increased when clinicians emphasize that limits on firearm access will decline when suicide risk abates (i.e., limits on firearm access will likely not be permanent). However, research has yet to determine if varying the level of fear messaging and/or emphasis on temporariness is actually useful and acceptable.

To address this gap, the investigators will randomly assign participants to one of four experimental conditions: (1) low-fear/not-temporary; (2) low-fear/temporary; (3) high-fear/not-temporary; and (4) high-fear/temporary. Participants include undergraduate students who are vulnerable to suicide and reported owning or previously owning a firearm, reported access to a firearm, or reported possibly obtaining a firearm in the future. The investigators hypothesized that individuals randomly assigned to the low-fear/temporary group will (1) report greater intentions to adhere to recommendations to limit access to firearms during at-risk periods than the other groups at both post-intervention and one-month follow-up; (2) report greater actual adherence to recommendations at one-month follow-up; and (3) rate the lethal means counseling session as more acceptable than the other groups. Exploratory aims examined if the effects differed for individuals reporting actual current firearm ownership or access, membership in the National Rifle Association (NRA) or a similar organization, political affiliation, political ideology, greater personal importance of the Second Amendment, or severity of suicidal symptoms. Findings have the potential to inform clinical and public health approaches to limit at-risk individuals' access to firearms for safety purposes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicide

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low-Fear/Not-Temporary

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lethal Means Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Lethal means counseling is broadly defined as clinician-initiated discussions that encourage an individual at risk for suicide to safely store his or her firearms. Examples in this domain include applying a gun lock, separating the gun from its ammunition, dismantling the firearm and keeping its components locked and/or separated, or safely transferring the firearm to a trusted loved one, friend, or police station until risk abates (Bryan, Stone, \& Rudd, 2011; Jin, Khazem, \& Anestis, 2016). Further, given that recent purchasers of firearms are at markedly increased risk of death by suicide (Wintemute, Parham, Beaumont, Wright, \& Drake, 1999), anticipatory counseling on firearm safety should also be considered for at-risk individuals who do not report currently owning or having access to a firearm, but who report prior firearm ownership/access or intentions of obtaining a firearm in the future (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2017).

Low-Fear/Temporary

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lethal Means Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Lethal means counseling is broadly defined as clinician-initiated discussions that encourage an individual at risk for suicide to safely store his or her firearms. Examples in this domain include applying a gun lock, separating the gun from its ammunition, dismantling the firearm and keeping its components locked and/or separated, or safely transferring the firearm to a trusted loved one, friend, or police station until risk abates (Bryan, Stone, \& Rudd, 2011; Jin, Khazem, \& Anestis, 2016). Further, given that recent purchasers of firearms are at markedly increased risk of death by suicide (Wintemute, Parham, Beaumont, Wright, \& Drake, 1999), anticipatory counseling on firearm safety should also be considered for at-risk individuals who do not report currently owning or having access to a firearm, but who report prior firearm ownership/access or intentions of obtaining a firearm in the future (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2017).

High-Fear/Not-Temporary

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lethal Means Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Lethal means counseling is broadly defined as clinician-initiated discussions that encourage an individual at risk for suicide to safely store his or her firearms. Examples in this domain include applying a gun lock, separating the gun from its ammunition, dismantling the firearm and keeping its components locked and/or separated, or safely transferring the firearm to a trusted loved one, friend, or police station until risk abates (Bryan, Stone, \& Rudd, 2011; Jin, Khazem, \& Anestis, 2016). Further, given that recent purchasers of firearms are at markedly increased risk of death by suicide (Wintemute, Parham, Beaumont, Wright, \& Drake, 1999), anticipatory counseling on firearm safety should also be considered for at-risk individuals who do not report currently owning or having access to a firearm, but who report prior firearm ownership/access or intentions of obtaining a firearm in the future (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2017).

High-Fear/Temporary

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lethal Means Counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Lethal means counseling is broadly defined as clinician-initiated discussions that encourage an individual at risk for suicide to safely store his or her firearms. Examples in this domain include applying a gun lock, separating the gun from its ammunition, dismantling the firearm and keeping its components locked and/or separated, or safely transferring the firearm to a trusted loved one, friend, or police station until risk abates (Bryan, Stone, \& Rudd, 2011; Jin, Khazem, \& Anestis, 2016). Further, given that recent purchasers of firearms are at markedly increased risk of death by suicide (Wintemute, Parham, Beaumont, Wright, \& Drake, 1999), anticipatory counseling on firearm safety should also be considered for at-risk individuals who do not report currently owning or having access to a firearm, but who report prior firearm ownership/access or intentions of obtaining a firearm in the future (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2017).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lethal Means Counseling

Lethal means counseling is broadly defined as clinician-initiated discussions that encourage an individual at risk for suicide to safely store his or her firearms. Examples in this domain include applying a gun lock, separating the gun from its ammunition, dismantling the firearm and keeping its components locked and/or separated, or safely transferring the firearm to a trusted loved one, friend, or police station until risk abates (Bryan, Stone, \& Rudd, 2011; Jin, Khazem, \& Anestis, 2016). Further, given that recent purchasers of firearms are at markedly increased risk of death by suicide (Wintemute, Parham, Beaumont, Wright, \& Drake, 1999), anticipatory counseling on firearm safety should also be considered for at-risk individuals who do not report currently owning or having access to a firearm, but who report prior firearm ownership/access or intentions of obtaining a firearm in the future (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2017).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Lifetime history of suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt
* Firearm familiarity (based on participants' self-report that they currently own a firearm, previously owned a firearm, have access to a firearm, have a desire to obtain a firearm in the future, or intend to obtain a firearm in the future)

Exclusion Criteria

* Younger than 18 years old
* Imminent risk of harm to self or others necessitating hospitalization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Florida State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ian Stanley

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Florida State University Department of Psychology

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stanley IH, Hom MA, Sachs-Ericsson NJ, Gallyer AJ, Joiner TE. A pilot randomized clinical trial of a lethal means safety intervention for young adults with firearm familiarity at risk for suicide. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Apr;88(4):372-383. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000481. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31916797 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017.20703

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention
NCT04888845 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Home Safety Intervention
NCT06216327 COMPLETED NA
Implementation of Suicide Risk Models in Health Systems
NCT06060535 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA