An ED-based RCT of Lethal Means Counseling for Parents of At-Risk Youth
NCT ID: NCT03143283
Last Updated: 2020-09-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
575 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-01
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A promising strategy is to counsel patients seen in the emergency department (ED) for a psychiatric emergency to reduce access to firearms (the most lethal suicide method) and medications (the most common method of suicide attempt). To date, however, few studies have evaluated changes in firearm storage practices among those who received lethal means counseling (LMC), and those that have, including a pilot conducted in Colorado by the study team, have lacked control groups. Results from the pilot, which provided emergency department based LMC counseling to parents of suicidal adolescents, found that among gun-owning parents, 33% had unlocked guns at home on the day of the ED visit and none did on follow up.
Using the piloted LMC protocol, we will conduct the first randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of the effectiveness of ED-based LMC on firearm and medication storage. The proposed RCT, to be conducted in five Colorado hospitals, will test whether parents of at-risk adolescents who are treated in hospitals that have (vs. have not yet) implemented our LMC protocol are more likely to store household firearms and medications safely. In addition, we will conduct in-depth, qualitative interviews with parents who have received LMC counseling to better understand those factors that affect parents' willingness and ability to make changes to firearm and medication storage. We will also conduct qualitative interviews with clinicians to understand factors affecting clinician engagement in LMC.
AIM 1: To assess the effectiveness of an ED-based LMC intervention to improve how parents of pediatric patients (age 10-17) who visit the ED for a mental health emergency store household firearms and medication.
AIM 2: To examine how attitudinal and contextual factors shape a) parents' decisions about firearm and medication storage following LMC, and b) clinicians' delivery of LMC messages.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Developing an Intervention to Promote Lethal Means Safety in Suicidal Adolescents
NCT05423483
Practice Facilitation to Enhance Implementation of a Pediatric Suicide Prevention Pathway
NCT06619782
Reducing Youth Access to Firearms Through the Health Care Setting
NCT02136225
Electronic, Self-Guided Safety Plan in Adolescents: Project SAFER
NCT06868407
Identifying Effective Approaches to Counseling on Firearm Safety
NCT03272048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Some of the largest reductions in national suicide rates have occurred when access to a commonly used and highly lethal suicide method was reduced. Consequently, reducing a suicidal person's access to lethal means of suicide ("means restriction") is a vital component of any effective national strategy for reducing suicide rates. Reducing access to firearms is particularly important given their greater lethality compared with other methods commonly used in US suicides and the very short deliberation period preceding nearly half of suicide attempts. Nonetheless, means restriction interventions remain uncommon. The CDC's recently released Research Priorities for the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, acknowledges this gap and calls for evaluation of the feasibility, scalability, and economic efficiency of means restriction strategies.
A recent study estimated that over 40% of youth suicide victims were seen in the ED in the year preceding their death. EDs have been identified by the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention as one of two key arenas for improved services to reduce the proportion of at-risk youth who progress to suicide, yet LMC in emergency departments remains uncommon: ED clinicians often do not offer any lethal means counseling to at-risk patients and their families, and many do not counsel on reducing access to firearms in particular. For example, Grossman and colleagues reported that although 80% of emergency nurses in Illinois had recent experience with suicidal adolescents, only 28% provided LMC to parents. A record review found that psychiatric residents at a psychiatric emergency department assessed firearm access in only 3% of pediatric patients.
ED-based lethal means counseling with parents of youth is a promising approach, but no RCTs have been conducted: Previous studies on LMC point to the need for fully powered RCTs in this area. A prospective follow-up study at a hospital ED where staff were instructed to deliver LMC messages to parents of all at-risk youth found that parents exposed to LMC were more likely to reduce the youth's access to lethal means than parents who were not exposed (75% vs. 48% for prescription drugs and 63% vs. 0% for firearms), but the number of gun- owning households (n=15) was very small. Promising evidence also comes from the pilot investigation that members of the study team conducted at Children's Hospital Colorado.
Our research team, which includes experts in suicide prevention, LMC, evaluation science, qualitative research, adolescent mental health, and emergency medicine, is well-suited to rigorously evaluate the study aims using a mixed-methods approach. Our five hospital sites will collaborate with study personnel to: a) establish IRB procedures and approvals, b) develop a system (in nearly all sites via the electronic medical record) to flag eligible patients, document provision of intervention services, and provide parent contact information to the study team, c) require the clinicians who will provide LMC to take the online training during their sites' two-week phase-in period, d) host an in-person training with a study investigator at a staff meeting during the phase-in period, and e) implement the new lethal means counseling protocol on their start date. A lead ED clinician at each site will be the point of contact to help manage logistics and access medical record information for the study in accordance with HIPAA regulations. The Colorado-based project coordinator (Brandspigel) will work with hospitals to develop site-specific consent and data transfer processes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
Hospital EDs are observed under usual care conditions (families receive usual care at the ED).
No interventions assigned to this group
Safety Study Lethal Means Counseling
During the intervention phase, mental health clinicians at EDs of participating hospitals are trained in lethal means counseling and implement the new protocol uniformly with eligible families.
Safety Study Lethal Means Counseling
Clinicians provide applicable families with locking devices and handouts on safe storage of firearms and medications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Safety Study Lethal Means Counseling
Clinicians provide applicable families with locking devices and handouts on safe storage of firearms and medications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
10 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Colorado School of Public Health
OTHER
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
OTHER
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
OTHER
Northeastern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Miller
Professor of Health Sciences and Epidemiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Miller, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northeastern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Penrose Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Memorial Central
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Memorial North
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
St. Francis Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Poudre Valley Hospital
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Medical Center of Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, United States
St. Mary Corwin Medical Center
Pueblo, Colorado, United States
Lutheran Medical Center
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Miller M, Salhi C, Barber C, Azrael D, Beatriz E, Berrigan J, Brandspigel S, Betz ME, Runyan C. Changes in Firearm and Medication Storage Practices in Homes of Youths at Risk for Suicide: Results of the SAFETY Study, a Clustered, Emergency Department-Based, Multisite, Stepped-Wedge Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;76(2):194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBT-0-013-15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.