Preventing Suicide With Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY)
NCT ID: NCT05537623
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-02
2025-02-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Family-Based Intervention for Adolescent Suicide Attempters (The SAFETY Study)
NCT00692302
Effectiveness Trial of Youth Suicide Prevention Delivered by Teen Peer Leaders
NCT02043093
Focused Suicide Prevention Strategy for Youth
NCT03488602
Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Sustainability of a Novel Personalized Smartphone Intervention for Suicide - Randomized Trial
NCT05202756
Brief Intervention for Suicide Risk Reduction in High Risk Adolescents
NCT02272179
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Is it feasible (operationalized as participation in treatment, completed homework assignments, reported adverse events) to offer SAFETY to youths with suicidal behavior and their caregivers within the CAMHS?
2. Is it feasible (operationalized as participation in treatment, completed homework assignments, reported adverse events) to offer Supportive Therapy as an active control treatment to youths with suicidal behavior and their caregivers within the CAMHS?
3. Is the planned procedure and design (recruitment, blinded assessors, randomization and data attrition) of the study feasible?
4. What are the proportions of suicidal behavior in the group randomized to SAFETY group and the group randomized to Supportive Therapy, respectively?
5. Is participation in SAFETY and Supportive Therapy associated with improved emotion regulation, perceived social support, and family function, and how large are the effects (suggested treatment processes)?
6. Is participation in SAFETY and Supportive Therapy associated with improvements in nonsuicidal self-injury, depression, anxiety, and other outcomes, and how large are the effects (outcomes)?
7. How do the youths and caregivers experience participation in SAFETY and Supportive Therapy, respectively?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY)
SAFETY is a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral family treatment informed by Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Multisystemic Therapy (MST). The twelve week long treatment is principle based, structured in phases, and individually tailored based on a cognitive-behavioral fit analysis that specifies key risk and protective processes. Each session contains one individual component for youth and parents respectively, and one family component where youth and parents work together with therapists to practice skills identified as critical for preventing future suicidal behavior. Treatment targets are arranged in a SAFETY Pyramid, consisting of (a) safe settings; (b) safe people; (c) safe activities and actions; (d) safe thought; and (e) safe stress reactions, emphasizing strengthening protective support and validation within the family and/or social environment surrounding the youth.
Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY)
Please see description of experimental arm (arm one)
Supportive Therapy
Supportive Therapy is a manualized client-centered therapy. The Supportive Therapy will be adapted to match SAFETY to control for nonspecific treatment factors such as therapist characteristics, time, and treatment exposure. The Supportive Therapy program consists of twelve weekly individual sessions with the youth, focusing on the therapeutic supporting relationship between the therapist and the youth, and follow-ups with parents. Therapeutic strategies include acceptance and validation, to increase feelings of connectedness and belonging and counteract thwarted belongingness, helplessness, and hopelessness. Cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., active modeling, problem-solving training, cognitive restructuring) are not allowed.
Supportive Therapy
Please see description of active comparator arm (arm two)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY)
Please see description of experimental arm (arm one)
Supportive Therapy
Please see description of active comparator arm (arm two)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 10-17 years
* At least one primary caregiver willing to participate in treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Ongoing treatment with DBT
* Individual or life circumstances that could complicate or make treatment participation impossible, or that require immediate intervention (e.g., violence in close relationships; intellectual disability)
* Insufficient understanding of the Swedish language
10 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Region Stockholm
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johan Bjureberg
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johan Bjureberg, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stockholm Regional Council
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karemyr M, Bellander M, Ponten M, Ohlis A, Flygare O, Wallden Y, Kuja-Halkola R, Hadlaczky G, Mataix-Cols D, Asarnow JR, Hellner C, Hughes JL, Bjureberg J. Preventing suicide with Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY): a randomised feasibility trial. BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Apr 29;28(1):e301575. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301575.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAFETY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.