Magnetocardiography Using a Novel Analysis System (Cardioflux) in the Evaluation of Emergency Department Observation Unit Chest Pain Patients
NCT ID: NCT03255772
Last Updated: 2022-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
101 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-07-15
2018-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a prospective observational single-blinded convenience pilot study of 100 patients placed in the Clinical Decision Unit (CDU) for evaluation of chest pain at St. John Hospital and Medical Center (Detroit, MI).
Patients enrolled in the study will also have a 30 and 180 day follow up for analysis of adverse cardiac events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Magnetocardiography in Evaluation of Patients Going for Cardiac Catheterization
NCT04044391
Acute Coronary Syndrome CardioFlux TM Study (ACCMED)
NCT04739267
MCG for Suspected INOCA Confirmed by Thermodilution-Derived CFR
NCT06139094
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
NCT03968809
MCG for Risk Stratifications of Patients With Chest Pain
NCT06316011
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute Chest pain
All patients admitted to the Clinical Decision Unit presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with chest pain with risk factors suggesting a possible cardiac etiology.
Magnetocardiography
Study subjects will be placed within a magnetic shielding apparatus. Noninvasive sensors placed over the subject's torso will acquire magnetic field fluctuations generated by cardiac activity, which will then be analyzed for evidence of myocardial ischemia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetocardiography
Study subjects will be placed within a magnetic shielding apparatus. Noninvasive sensors placed over the subject's torso will acquire magnetic field fluctuations generated by cardiac activity, which will then be analyzed for evidence of myocardial ischemia.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients unable to fit into device
3. Non-ambulatory patients
4. Patients with any implantable device or metal in the thorax area (e.g. pacemaker, AICD, bullet fragments in thorax)
5. Patients with claustrophobia
6. Pregnant women
7. Poor candidate for follow-up
8. Prisoners
9. Repeat participants
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. John Hospital & Medical Center
OTHER
Genetesis Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. John Hospital and Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen Y, Fan Y, Yin Z, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Han Z, Wang C. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):2096-2103. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13782.
Hollander JE. The continuing search to identify the very-low-risk chest pain patient. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;6(10):979-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01177.x. No abstract available.
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, Kontos MC, McCord J, Miller TD, Morise A, Newby LK, Ruberg FL, Scordo KA, Thompson PD; American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010 Oct 26;122(17):1756-76. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181ec61df. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
Pollack CV Jr, Sites FD, Shofer FS, Sease KL, Hollander JE. Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Patel MR, Raskin IE, Hendel RC, Bateman TM, Cerqueira MD, Gibbons RJ, Gillam LD, Gillespie JA, Hendel RC, Iskandrian AE, Jerome SD, Krumholz HM, Messer JV, Spertus JA, Stowers SA; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; American Heart Association. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1587-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.029.
Chaikovsky I, Hailer B, Sosnytskyy V, Lutay M, Mjasnikov G, Kazmirchuk A, Bydnyk M, Lomakovskyy A, Sosnytskaja T. Predictive value of the complex magnetocardiographic index in patients with intermediate pretest probability of chronic coronary artery disease: results of a two-center study. Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Sep;25(6):474-84. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000107.
Lim HK, Chung N, Kim K, Ko YG, Kwon H, Lee YH, Kim JB, Cho JR, Kim JM, Kim IS, Park YK. Reproducibility of quantitative estimate of magnetocardiographic ventricular depolarization and repolarization parameters in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Jan;35(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9210-9. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
Goernig M, Liehr M, Tute C, Schlosser M, Haueisen J, Figulla HR, Leder U. Magnetocardiography based spatiotemporal correlation analysis is superior to conventional ECG analysis for identifying myocardial injury. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009 Jan;37(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9598-5. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
Tolstrup K, Madsen BE, Ruiz JA, Greenwood SD, Camacho J, Siegel RJ, Gertzen HC, Park JW, Smars PA. Non-invasive resting magnetocardiographic imaging for the rapid detection of ischemia in subjects presenting with chest pain. Cardiology. 2006;106(4):270-6. doi: 10.1159/000093490. Epub 2006 May 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1053362-5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.