A Study to Assess the Accuracy of Magnetocardiography (MCG) to Diagnose True Ischemia in Patients With Chest Pain in the ED

NCT ID: NCT05809648

Last Updated: 2026-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-17

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the research is to see if patients that come to the Emergency Department with chest pain can be more accurately and more quickly diagnosed by magnetocardiography (MCG) to see if their chest pain is caused by coronary ischemia (reduced blood flow to the heart) in patients with normal or have non-specific changes on the ECG vs other causes by other reasons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis: MCG can accurately, and in real-time, identify an acute coronary syndrome for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and is faster than current practice.

Aims, purpose, or objectives: Our primary objective is to measure the diagnostic accuracy of the Mesuron Avalon-H90 MCG device to detect ACS (unstable angina, NSTEMI) in Emergency Department patients who present with acute chest pain when compared to the current goal standard.

Our secondary objectives are as follows:

* To study the ability of MCG to rule in or rule out ACS in real-time. We will assess the value of the MCG results in conjunction with the HEART pathway score. This will include looking at the diagnostic test accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the device when used in conjunction with and without the HEART Pathway score, including versus excluding the troponin level (as the results of this is usually delayed by 45 minutes to 1 hour). In this way, we hope to demonstrate this technology may decrease ED length of stay in chest pain patients and decrease time to diagnosis. The comparison goal standard will be the Cardiology diagnosis, the result of serial troponins, or the ED diagnosis depending on the disposition of the patient.
* To estimate ability of MCG for prognostication for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 days, 7 days, 30 days and 90 days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Pain Emergency Medicine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain when an ACS is on the differential diagnosis.
* Patient willing and able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* ST elevation \> 1 mm on any two contiguous ECG leads.
* Hemodynamic instability (SBP \>220 or \<80, HR \>160).
* Pregnant patients.
* Incarcerated patients (FMC patients).
* Patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator.
* Metal implants in the body (that are not MRI safe).
* Patients that are unable to lie down in the MCG machine or stay still.
* Patients who are unable to understand the informed consent process (ex: non-English speakers without an available interpreter, cognitive delay).
* Patients without the capacity to provide written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sara A. Hevesi

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sara Hevesi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic Minnesota

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-001225

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The ORCHESTRATE-Myocarditis Registry
NCT05139329 NOT_YET_RECRUITING