A Study to Assess the Accuracy of Magnetocardiography (MCG) to Diagnose True Ischemia in Patients With Chest Pain in the ED
NCT ID: NCT05809648
Last Updated: 2026-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-17
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI Evaluation of Chest Pain
NCT00001961
Clinical Echocardiography and S' Wave for Early Recognition of Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department, A Prospective Study
NCT06860997
Stress Echocardiography and Heart Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
NCT01384448
Novel Method to Diagnose Acute Myocardial Ischemia
NCT00285922
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of MCG(Magnetocardiography) Scan in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
NCT05825911
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aims, purpose, or objectives: Our primary objective is to measure the diagnostic accuracy of the Mesuron Avalon-H90 MCG device to detect ACS (unstable angina, NSTEMI) in Emergency Department patients who present with acute chest pain when compared to the current goal standard.
Our secondary objectives are as follows:
* To study the ability of MCG to rule in or rule out ACS in real-time. We will assess the value of the MCG results in conjunction with the HEART pathway score. This will include looking at the diagnostic test accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the device when used in conjunction with and without the HEART Pathway score, including versus excluding the troponin level (as the results of this is usually delayed by 45 minutes to 1 hour). In this way, we hope to demonstrate this technology may decrease ED length of stay in chest pain patients and decrease time to diagnosis. The comparison goal standard will be the Cardiology diagnosis, the result of serial troponins, or the ED diagnosis depending on the disposition of the patient.
* To estimate ability of MCG for prognostication for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 days, 7 days, 30 days and 90 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient willing and able to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Hemodynamic instability (SBP \>220 or \<80, HR \>160).
* Pregnant patients.
* Incarcerated patients (FMC patients).
* Patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator.
* Metal implants in the body (that are not MRI safe).
* Patients that are unable to lie down in the MCG machine or stay still.
* Patients who are unable to understand the informed consent process (ex: non-English speakers without an available interpreter, cognitive delay).
* Patients without the capacity to provide written informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sara A. Hevesi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sara Hevesi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Minnesota
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-001225
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.