Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
390 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-27
2023-03-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetocardiography Using a Novel Analysis System (Cardioflux) in the Evaluation of Emergency Department Observation Unit Chest Pain Patients
NCT03255772
Use of Magnetocardiography in Evaluation of Patients Going for Cardiac Catheterization
NCT04044391
MCG as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
NCT05150054
MCG for Suspected INOCA Confirmed by Thermodilution-Derived CFR
NCT06139094
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients at Intermediate Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT00473863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CardioFlux
Not an intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient presenting acutely with signs and symptoms suggestive of ACS.
3. Informed Consent Form signed by subject or LAR.
4. HEART Score of \>2.
5. Patient consented within 4 hours of the beginning of the clinical assessment (exclusive of any screening examination) for suspected ACS by an appropriately credentialed clinician.
Exclusion Criteria
2. STEMI.
3. Unable to fit into device.
4. Non-ambulatory patients.
5. Positive response on MCG metal checklist.
6. Deemed hemodynamically unstable by treating physician, regardless of cause.
7. Unable to lie supine for up to 5 minutes.
8. Poor candidate for follow-up (e.g., no access to phone).
9. Prisoners.
10. Repeat participants.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Genetesis Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharon Mace, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Genetesis Facility
Mason, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25. No abstract available.
Yang G, Yao Y, Du Y, Huang J. Cardiac troponin had limited diagnostic value for acute myocardial infarction in renal insufficiency: a meta-analysis. Biomark Med. 2020 Apr;14(6):481-493. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2019-0339. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Chiang CH, Chiang CH, Lee GH, Gi WT, Wu YK, Huang SS, Yeo YH, Giannitsis E, Lee CC. Safety and efficacy of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm for diagnosis of myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2020 Jul;106(13):985-991. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316343. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Lee CC, Huang SS, Yeo YH, Hou YT, Park JY, Inoue K, Hsu WT. High-sensitivity-cardiac troponin for accelerated diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1402-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
Madsen TE, Stewart M, Smyres C, Beal A, Hamilton D, Vlasic K, Oates A. Significance of an Indeterminate Troponin I in Patients Evaluated for Chest Pain in an Emergency Department Observation Unit. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Dec;14(4):146-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000054.
Madsen T, Perkins R, Holt B, Carlson M, Steenblik J, Bossart P, Hartsell S. Emergency Department Observation Unit Utilization Among Older Patients With Chest Pain. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 Mar;18(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000166.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1000-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.