Evaluation of EUS-guided FNA for Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis
NCT ID: NCT03241797
Last Updated: 2017-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Yield of FNA Needle and FNB Needle for Autoimmune Pancreatitis
NCT03753815
Prospective Study on the Role of Eus-fnb in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis
NCT04397731
Clinical Evaluation of EUS-FNA on Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
NCT02041897
EUS-FNB for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Side-fenestrated Vs Fork-tip Needle
NCT03622229
Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04924725
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients who suggested having AIP
Patients who suggested having AIP and underwent EUS-FNA biopsy by using a standard 22-gauge aspiration needle were enrolled between January 2013 and May 2017.
EUS-FNA
Once the lesion was evaluated by EUS, the echoendoscopist would select the shortest pathway, while avoiding blood vessels, to reach the lesion. Under real-time visualization, slow-pull technique and suction technique were used to punctured each lesions. The specimens were expelled onto glass slides, and then prepared for histological and cytological examinations.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-FNA
Once the lesion was evaluated by EUS, the echoendoscopist would select the shortest pathway, while avoiding blood vessels, to reach the lesion. Under real-time visualization, slow-pull technique and suction technique were used to punctured each lesions. The specimens were expelled onto glass slides, and then prepared for histological and cytological examinations.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bin Cheng
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bin Cheng
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bin Cheng, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tongji Hospital
Yun Wang, Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Tongji Hospital
Li Cao, Doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Tongji Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tongji hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
SARLES H, SARLES JC, MURATORE R, GUIEN C. Chronic inflammatory sclerosis of the pancreas--an autonomous pancreatic disease? Am J Dig Dis. 1961 Jul;6:688-98. doi: 10.1007/BF02232341. No abstract available.
Hart PA, Kamisawa T, Brugge WR, Chung JB, Culver EL, Czako L, Frulloni L, Go VL, Gress TM, Kim MH, Kawa S, Lee KT, Lerch MM, Liao WC, Lohr M, Okazaki K, Ryu JK, Schleinitz N, Shimizu K, Shimosegawa T, Soetikno R, Webster G, Yadav D, Zen Y, Chari ST. Long-term outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis: a multicentre, international analysis. Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1771-6. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303617. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
Meng Q, Xin L, Liu W, Lin H, Tian B, Wang L, Li Z. Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Pancreatitis in China: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0130466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130466. eCollection 2015.
Hoki N, Mizuno N, Sawaki A, Tajika M, Takayama R, Shimizu Y, Bhatia V, Yamao K. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(2):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2294-2. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
Pearson RK, Longnecker DS, Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Okazaki K, Frulloni L, Cavallini G. Controversies in clinical pancreatology: autoimmune pancreatitis: does it exist? Pancreas. 2003 Jul;27(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200307000-00001. No abstract available.
Kim KP, Kim MH, Kim JC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune chronic pancreatitis revisited. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr 28;12(16):2487-96. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2487.
Kim MH, Kwon S. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;42 Suppl 18:42-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-007-2050-z.
Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJ, Smyrk TC, Clain JE, Harewood GC, Pearson RK, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Yusuf TE, Chari ST, Petersen BT. EUS-guided trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):467-72. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02802-0.
Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, Ohno E, Matsubara H, Itoh Y, Nakamura Y, Nakamura M, Miyahara R, Hayashi K, Ishigami M, Katano Y, Ohmiya N, Goto H, Hirooka Y. Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 May;71(6):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.023.
Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, Ando N, Nakashima M, Adachi S, Hirose Y, Mukai T, Iwata K, Tomita E, Itoi T, Moriwaki H. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;10(3):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.032. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima F, Iwashita T, Kodama Y, Katanuma A, Ohara H, Kitano M, Inoue H, Itoi T, Mizuno N, Miyakawa H, Mikata R, Irisawa A, Sato S, Notohara K, Shimosegawa T. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):797-804.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1511. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada S, Fujishima F, Unno J, Kume K, Kikuta K, Hirota M, Masamune A, Satoh K, Notohara K, Shimosegawa T. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.014.
Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S, Iwashita T, Kojima Y, Yamada T, Sawada M, Takami T, Moriwaki H, Soehendra N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy. 2006 Sep;38(9):919-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944665.
Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Goto N, Nakashima M, Doi S, Hirose Y, Takami T, Moriwaki H. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for splenic tumor: a case series. Endoscopy. 2009 Feb;41(2):179-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119474. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
Mizuno N, Bhatia V, Hosoda W, Sawaki A, Hoki N, Hara K, Takagi T, Ko SB, Yatabe Y, Goto H, Yamao K. Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):742-50. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0062-6. Epub 2009 May 12.
Na HK, Lee JH, Park YS, Ahn JY, Choi KS, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Kim JH. Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2015 Mar;48(2):152-7. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.2.152. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Itoi T, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Kawai T, Moriyasu F. Experimental endoscopy: objective evaluation of EUS needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.017.
Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis: focal pancreatitis or cancer? Is there a role for FNA/biopsy? Autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2006 Jun;38 Suppl 1:S30-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-946648. No abstract available.
Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy of the pancreas: prospects and problems. Pancreatology. 2007;7(2-3):163-6. doi: 10.1159/000104240. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
Suda K, Takase M, Fukumura Y, Ogura K, Ueda A, Matsuda T, Suzuki F. Histopathologic characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis based on comparison with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2005 May;30(4):355-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000160283.41580.88.
Notohara K, Burgart LJ, Yadav D, Chari S, Smyrk TC. Idiopathic chronic pancreatitis with periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration: clinicopathologic features of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Aug;27(8):1119-27. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200308000-00009.
Hoshimoto S, Aiura K, Tanaka M, Shito M, Kakefuda T, Sugiura H. Mass-forming type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic cancer. J Dig Dis. 2016 Mar;17(3):202-209. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12316.
Weber SM, Cubukcu-Dimopulo O, Palesty JA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra D, Brennan MF, Conlon K. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis: inflammatory mimic of pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jan;7(1):129-37; discussion 137-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00148-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AIP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.