Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT ID: NCT01936467
Last Updated: 2017-04-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
121 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are currently several techniques for obtaining tissue during endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspirate. The procedure will be performed by either the capillary suction technique or no suction technique.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04164017
Optimal Number of To-and-fro Motion in EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Masses
NCT01576497
Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique
NCT01923883
Modified Wet Suction Versus Capillary Techniques for EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy of Solid Lesions
NCT02919553
EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique
NCT03111368
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard suction
These are patients who will have endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using the standard suction FNA technique: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with use of 10cc suction syringe.
Standard technique EUS-FNA
Standard suction Endoscopic Ultrasound- Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) technique using the 22-gauge (Expect needle; Boston Scientific) needle: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with use of 10cc suction syringe.
Capillary suction
These are patients who will have endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using the capillary suction FNA technique: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by pulling the needle stylet slowly and continuously.
Capillary suction technique for EUS FNA
Capillary suction Endoscopic Ultrasound- Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) technique using the 22-gauge (Expect needle; Boston Scientific) needle: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by pulling the needle stylet slowly and continuously
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard technique EUS-FNA
Standard suction Endoscopic Ultrasound- Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) technique using the 22-gauge (Expect needle; Boston Scientific) needle: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with use of 10cc suction syringe.
Capillary suction technique for EUS FNA
Capillary suction Endoscopic Ultrasound- Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) technique using the 22-gauge (Expect needle; Boston Scientific) needle: 15 to-and-fro movements within the lesion will be performed with simultaneous minimal negative pressure provided by pulling the needle stylet slowly and continuously
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet \< 50,000)
* Uncooperative patients
* Pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing, which is routine for all endoscopic procedures)
* Refusal to consent form
* Cystic lesions
* Inaccessible lesions to EUS
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mouen Khashab
Assistant Professor of Medicine; Director of Therapeutic Endoscopy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mouen A Khashab, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins Univeristy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Howard County General Hospital
Columbia, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saxena P, El Zein M, Stevens T, Abdelgelil A, Besharati S, Messallam A, Kumbhari V, Azola A, Brainard J, Shin EJ, Lennon AM, Canto MI, Singh VK, Khashab MA. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):497-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122381. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NA_00079301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.