Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT ID: NCT04164017
Last Updated: 2019-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-01
2020-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, there is no clear establishment of the usefulness of syringe suction for the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions when FNB is used.
Because of that, the investigators aimed to compare sensitivity, sample adequacy, and diagnostic yield of solid pancreatic lesions EUS-guided sampling using with and without syringe suction.
The study will be conducted on a consecutive sample of patients proposed to perform EUS for solid pancreatic lesions characterization, in which the clinical and imaging findings justify the need for an FNB.
For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction, and another without suction. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.
Clinical care during and after the procedure will follow the existing guidelines.
Participants will undergo a single clinical evaluation (at the time of endoscopy and recovery) without the need for follow-up visits.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT01936467
Multicentered Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial For Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04841616
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT05549856
Different Suction Techniques For Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy In Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03849209
Modified Wet Suction Versus Capillary Techniques for EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy of Solid Lesions
NCT02919553
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS-guided FNB with syringe suction
EUS-guided FNB with Syringe Suction
For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.
EUS-guided FNB without syringe suction
EUS-guided FNB without Syringe Suction
For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-guided FNB with Syringe Suction
For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.
EUS-guided FNB without Syringe Suction
For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to provide free and informed consent before entering the study;
* Imaging diagnosis of a solid pancreatic lesion that was proposed for EUS characterization;
* Presence of sectional imaging method (CT/MRI) performed within six months before randomization;
* Blood test (blood count and coagulation studies) compatible with the performance of invasive maneuvers;
* Clinical indication by the endoscopist for EUS-tissue acquisition with the use of an FNB needle.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically significant change in haemostasis laboratory parameters: International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.5; activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)\> 50 seconds; Platelets \<50,000;
* Absence of a proper anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregate therapy discontinuation for the performance of FNB;
* Absence of fasting (2h without clear liquids and 6h without solid foods);
* Clinical suspicion of upper digestive tract obstruction;
* An episode of acute pancreatitis within four weeks before echoendoscopy;
* Respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability;
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pedro Costa Moreira
Investigador Principal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Hospitalar São João
Porto, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wani S, Muthusamy VR, McGrath CM, Sepulveda AR, Das A, Messersmith W, Kochman ML, Shah J. AGA White Paper: Optimizing Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition and Future Directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):318-327. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 23. No abstract available.
Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):939-59.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.066. No abstract available.
Dwyer J, Pantanowitz L, Ohori NP, Pai RK, Vrbin C, Brand RE, Monaco SE. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Feb;124(2):110-21. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21623. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, Kim KM, Shin JU, Lee JK, Lee KT, Jang KT. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V, Eloubeidi MA, Etamad R, Matsuda K, Lewin D, Van Velse A, Hennesey W, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):441-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.117764.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
77/19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.