Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

NCT ID: NCT04164017

Last Updated: 2019-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tissue acquisition by Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) has become a modality of diagnosis and clinical orientation for several diseases. Although tissue acquisition traditionally involves the cytological diagnosis (using fine-needle aspiration/FNA), the importance of obtaining a core for histological examination (by fine-needle biopsy/FNB) has recently been recognized.

Currently, there is no clear establishment of the usefulness of syringe suction for the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions when FNB is used.

Because of that, the investigators aimed to compare sensitivity, sample adequacy, and diagnostic yield of solid pancreatic lesions EUS-guided sampling using with and without syringe suction.

The study will be conducted on a consecutive sample of patients proposed to perform EUS for solid pancreatic lesions characterization, in which the clinical and imaging findings justify the need for an FNB.

For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction, and another without suction. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.

Clinical care during and after the procedure will follow the existing guidelines.

Participants will undergo a single clinical evaluation (at the time of endoscopy and recovery) without the need for follow-up visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biopsy, Fine-Needle Endosonography Pancreatic Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS-guided FNB with syringe suction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EUS-guided FNB with Syringe Suction

Intervention Type DEVICE

For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.

EUS-guided FNB without syringe suction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EUS-guided FNB without Syringe Suction

Intervention Type DEVICE

For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS-guided FNB with Syringe Suction

For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

EUS-guided FNB without Syringe Suction

For each case, FNB will be performed using two punctures: one with 20mL syringe suction and another without aspiration. The order in which they will be performed will be known only by the performing physician and the nursing team at the time that FNB is proposed. This information will be concealed from the pathologist responsible for sample analysis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with 18 years of age and older;
* Ability to provide free and informed consent before entering the study;
* Imaging diagnosis of a solid pancreatic lesion that was proposed for EUS characterization;
* Presence of sectional imaging method (CT/MRI) performed within six months before randomization;
* Blood test (blood count and coagulation studies) compatible with the performance of invasive maneuvers;
* Clinical indication by the endoscopist for EUS-tissue acquisition with the use of an FNB needle.

Exclusion Criteria

* Failure to provide free and informed consent;
* Clinically significant change in haemostasis laboratory parameters: International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.5; activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)\> 50 seconds; Platelets \<50,000;
* Absence of a proper anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregate therapy discontinuation for the performance of FNB;
* Absence of fasting (2h without clear liquids and 6h without solid foods);
* Clinical suspicion of upper digestive tract obstruction;
* An episode of acute pancreatitis within four weeks before echoendoscopy;
* Respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability;
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pedro Costa Moreira

Investigador Principal

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro Hospitalar São João

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pedro Costa-Moreira

Role: CONTACT

+351913543173

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Pedro Costa-Moreira

Role: primary

+351913543173

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wani S, Muthusamy VR, McGrath CM, Sepulveda AR, Das A, Messersmith W, Kochman ML, Shah J. AGA White Paper: Optimizing Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition and Future Directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):318-327. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29074447 (View on PubMed)

Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):939-59.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.066. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25434654 (View on PubMed)

Dwyer J, Pantanowitz L, Ohori NP, Pai RK, Vrbin C, Brand RE, Monaco SE. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Feb;124(2):110-21. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21623. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26430767 (View on PubMed)

Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, Kim KM, Shin JU, Lee JK, Lee KT, Jang KT. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23433878 (View on PubMed)

Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V, Eloubeidi MA, Etamad R, Matsuda K, Lewin D, Van Velse A, Hennesey W, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):441-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.117764.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11577304 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

77/19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 EUS-FNB Techniques
NCT05825729 RECRUITING PHASE4