A Real-world Comparison of FNB and FNA in IHC-required Lesions.
NCT ID: NCT05565066
Last Updated: 2022-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
439 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-12-01
2022-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Multi-center, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA on Solid Occupying Lesion
NCT02327065
Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment
NCT04165018
The Use of FNA and FNB in the Optimization of EUS-assisted Tissue Sampling
NCT02360839
Evaluation of EUS-Guided 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Versus Fine-needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasms
NCT01673334
EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With a New Core Histology Needle Versus Conventional Fine Needle Aspiration
NCT01774162
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators performed this at 2 tertiary care centers in China. The study prospectively collected patients undergoing EUS for a solid mass (\>1 cm) in the pancreas, abdomen, mediastinum, or pelvic cavity from December 2014 diagnosed with AIP, NET, mesenchymal tumors, and Lymphoma. Patients accepted FNB or FNA according to doctors' and patients' willingness in a real-world setting. All procedures were performed by experienced endosonographers; cytologists and pathologists were blinded to the sample collection method. Patients were followed for at least 48 weeks, and final diagnoses were obtained after surgery, imaging analysis, or resolution of the lesion. The primary aim was to compare diagnostic yields of EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB for all solid masses, then separately as AIP, NET, mesenchymal tumors, and lymphoma. The secondary endpoint was the quality of the histologic specimen.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FNB group
FNB needles adpted to acquire lesion tissues according patients' advice and patients' willings.
FNB group
Fine-needle-biopsy (Echotip ProCore Needle)
FNA group
FNA needles adpted to acquire lesion tissues according patients' advice and patients' willings.
FNA group
Fine-needle-aspiration (Echotip Needle)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FNB group
Fine-needle-biopsy (Echotip ProCore Needle)
FNA group
Fine-needle-aspiration (Echotip Needle)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* presence of a solid mass lesion was confirmed by at least 1 imaging modality and it was located within pancreas, abdomen, mediastinum, or pelvic cavity;
* mass size \>1 cm;
* final diagnoses were obtained after surgery, imaging analysis, or resolution of the lesion, including AIP, NET, mesenchymal tumors, and lymphoma.
Exclusion Criteria
* thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000/mm3);
* acute pancreatitis within the previous 2 weeks;
* inability to safely perform EUS-TA (eg, cardiorespiratory dysfunction, mental diseases, or drug addiction);
* refusal or inability to provide an informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking Union Medical College
OTHER
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bin Cheng
Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, HUST
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FNB-2022tj
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.