22G FNA Needle vs. 22G ProCore Needle

NCT ID: NCT01394159

Last Updated: 2018-03-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this research study is to identify the best needle for performing biopsy during EUS procedures. There are two types of needles for performing biopsy: A FNA needle that provides a small sample of tissue for analysis and a 22G ProCore needle that provides larger amount of tissue. It is not clear at this point which of the two needles is superior for performing biopsy. This study will attempt to identify the better needle by assessing the performance of both needles in a randomized fashion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this randomized trial, the 22G standard fine needle aspiration needle was compared with the newly developed 22G ProCore needle for sampling pancreatic mass lesions during endoscopic ultrasound. Patients were randomized into the two needle groups and then various outcomes were compared between the two needle types, including the number of passes needed to establish a diagnosis, the ability to procure enough tissue sample to be able to make a diagnosis, the rates of needle failure and complication rates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

22G ProCore biopsy needle

Using the 22G ProCore needle for sampling pancreatic mass lesions, the tissue obtained will be compared to the standard FNA needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

22G ProCore biopsy needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tissue will be acquired with the 22G Procore biopsy needle and the sample will be compared to the sample obtained with the 22G standard FNA needle.

22G standard FNA needle

Using the 22G standard fine needle aspiration needle (FNA) for sampling pancreatic mass lesions, the tissue obtained will be compared to the 22 G ProCore needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

22G standard FNA needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tissue will be acquired with the 22G standard FNA biopsy needle and the sample will be compared to the sample obtained with the 22G ProCore biopsy needle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

22G ProCore biopsy needle

Tissue will be acquired with the 22G Procore biopsy needle and the sample will be compared to the sample obtained with the 22G standard FNA needle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

22G standard FNA needle

Tissue will be acquired with the 22G standard FNA biopsy needle and the sample will be compared to the sample obtained with the 22G ProCore biopsy needle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biopsy biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-All patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions

Exclusion Criteria

* Coaguloapthy,
* minors,
* prgenant patients
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AdventHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shyam Varadarajulu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392. Epub 2012 May 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22658389 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F110506010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

On-site Cytopathology EUS-FNA
NCT01386931 COMPLETED