Robotic-assisted Training After Upper Arm Fracture

NCT ID: NCT03100201

Last Updated: 2020-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-15

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, patients with upper arm fracture will receive an additive robotic-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for three weeks on the injured arm in addition to conventional physio- and occupational therapy. The supportive treatment and execution of specific exercises on the Armeo®Spring should lead to improved recovery of function and mobility of the upper arm compared to conservatively treated patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

60 Patients aged between 35 and 70 years with proximal humeral fracture and surgical treatment will be recruited in three different clinics in Germany and randomised into an intervention and a control group. Participants will be assessed before randomisation and followed up after completing an intervention period of 3 weeks and additionally after 3, 6 and 12 months. Baseline assessment will assess cognition (SOMC), level of pain in the affected arm, ability to work, gait speed (10m walk), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), as well as the range of motion of the affected arm (goniometer measurement), visual acuity and motor function of orthopaedic patients (WMFT-O). Clinical follow up directly after intervention will assess disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), the range of motion and motor function (WMFT-O). Primary outcome parameter will be the DASH and secondary outcome parameter will be the WMFT-O. The long-term results will be assessed prospectively by a postal follow-up. All patients will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy. The intervention group will receive an additive robotic-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for three weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be recruited in three different clinics in Germany and randomised into an intervention and a control group. All patients will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy. The intervention group will receive an additive robotic-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for three weeks.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Armeo®Spring

The intervention group will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy and an additive robotic-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for three weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intervention Armeo®Spring

Intervention Type OTHER

The robotic-assisted training will be performed using the clinically evaluated Armeo®Spring medical device (Hocoma AG, Zurich, Switzerland). By means of a sensory orthosis, arm movements will be supported and transmitted to a computer system and visually shown on a screen.

Control group

The control group will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control Group

Intervention Type OTHER

The control group will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy over 3 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intervention Armeo®Spring

The robotic-assisted training will be performed using the clinically evaluated Armeo®Spring medical device (Hocoma AG, Zurich, Switzerland). By means of a sensory orthosis, arm movements will be supported and transmitted to a computer system and visually shown on a screen.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control Group

The control group will receive conventional occupational- and physiotherapy over 3 weeks

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* surgical treatment of the shoulder joint after upper arm fracture classified as type AO 11
* movement-stable fracture
* Inclusion between the fourth and the seventh week after surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* limited cognition as defined by a score in Short-Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMC) less than 10 points
* inadequate level of pain during movement of the affected shoulder joint (pain score \>5 on a visual analogue pain scale)
* strongly limited vision or hearing
* heart failure (New York Heart Association stage III-IV) or COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Gold stage III-IV
* walking speed \<0.8m/sec
* isolated tuberculum majus fracture of the humerus (AO 11, A1)
* fractures with involvement of the glenoid cavity
* double fractures
* injury of the plexus or the axillaris nerve
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

BG Unfallklinik Murnau

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DGUV)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Corinna Nerz

Research associate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Augat, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

BG Unfallklinik Murnau

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Klinik Ludwigshafen

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Klinik Murnau

Murnau am Staffelsee, , Germany

Site Status

Robert-Bosch-Hospital

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35727196 (View on PubMed)

Nerz C, Schwickert L, Scholch S, Gordt K, Nolte PC, Kroger I, Augat P, Becker C. Inter-rater reliability, sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the orthopaedic Wolf-Motor-Function-Test as functional capacity measure before and after rehabilitation in patients with proximal humeral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 6;20(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2691-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31279331 (View on PubMed)

Nerz C, Schwickert L, Becker C, Studier-Fischer S, Mussig JA, Augat P. Effectiveness of robot-assisted training added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with humeral fracture early after surgical treatment: protocol of a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. Trials. 2017 Dec 6;18(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2274-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29212528 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RASTA 2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.