Robot-based Wrist Rehabilitation in Orthopaedics: Efficacy and Comparison With Traditional Methods
NCT ID: NCT04739644
Last Updated: 2021-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-07
2018-06-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Ankle Fractures: Efficacy and Comparison With Traditional Methods
NCT02923479
Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Extremities
NCT02434237
Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients With Task-Specific Robot-Aided Arm Therapy
NCT00719433
Active Smart Wearable Orthosis for Enhanched Rehabilitation THErapy
NCT03153254
Evaluation of Limb Function and Perception in Rehabilitation After Traumatic Wrist Fracture Surgery
NCT06866340
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: WRISTBOT Group
The patients in the "WRISTBOT Group" underwent to following interventions: 1. General Rehabilitation 2. Specific wrist rehabilitation by WRISTBOT device
Specific wrist rehabilitation by WRISTBOT device
The WRISTBOT is a fully backdrivable manipulandum that allows for movements along its 3 Degrees of Freedom (DoFs) in a human-like Range Of Motion (ROM) of the wrist: 62° flexion/extension (FE), -40°/+45° in ulnar/radial deviation (RUD), and 60° pronation/supination (PS). In addition, the robot permits motions along planes that involve combined multi-DoFs movements. Mechanically, the robot was developed to have low values of inertia, emulating the fluency of natural movements. Each DOF is measured by high resolution incremental encoders and actuated by one brushless motor or two in case of the RUD planes, providing both gravity compensation and continuous torque values necessary to manipulate the human wrist joints. Depending on the torques exerted, the device can be used in either active or assistive/passive modality. The system is integrated with a Virtual Reality environment (VR), useful to provide a visual feedback to the user while he/she is requested to complete the tasks.
General rehabilitation
Exercise with elastic bands or weights, exercise of manipulation and dexterity, simulation of daily life activities supervised by the physiotherapist
Control group
The patients in the Control Group underwent to following interventions: 1. General Rehabilitation 2. Specific wrist rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist.
Specific wrist rehabilitation performed by the physiotherapist
Passive, active and assisted mobilization
General rehabilitation
Exercise with elastic bands or weights, exercise of manipulation and dexterity, simulation of daily life activities supervised by the physiotherapist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Specific wrist rehabilitation by WRISTBOT device
The WRISTBOT is a fully backdrivable manipulandum that allows for movements along its 3 Degrees of Freedom (DoFs) in a human-like Range Of Motion (ROM) of the wrist: 62° flexion/extension (FE), -40°/+45° in ulnar/radial deviation (RUD), and 60° pronation/supination (PS). In addition, the robot permits motions along planes that involve combined multi-DoFs movements. Mechanically, the robot was developed to have low values of inertia, emulating the fluency of natural movements. Each DOF is measured by high resolution incremental encoders and actuated by one brushless motor or two in case of the RUD planes, providing both gravity compensation and continuous torque values necessary to manipulate the human wrist joints. Depending on the torques exerted, the device can be used in either active or assistive/passive modality. The system is integrated with a Virtual Reality environment (VR), useful to provide a visual feedback to the user while he/she is requested to complete the tasks.
Specific wrist rehabilitation performed by the physiotherapist
Passive, active and assisted mobilization
General rehabilitation
Exercise with elastic bands or weights, exercise of manipulation and dexterity, simulation of daily life activities supervised by the physiotherapist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Post-immobilization phase
* Temporal distance from the acute event not exceeding 6 months
* Signed informed consent acquisition
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or breast feeding; Current or prior history of malignancy
* Open skin at the level of the patient-device interface
* Sensory deficit at the level of the patient-device interface
* Acute inflammatory arthritis of the wrist
* Contraindications to passive movements
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
OTHER
Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo Catitti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karagiannopoulos C, Sitler M, Michlovitz S, Tierney R. A descriptive study on wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment and function following distal radius fracture intervention. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):204-14; quiz 215. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
Bruder AM, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N. Physiotherapy intervention practice patterns used in rehabilitation after distal radial fracture. Physiotherapy. 2013 Sep;99(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
Bruder A, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N. Exercise reduces impairment and improves activity in people after some upper limb fractures: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2011;57(2):71-82. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70017-0.
Krischak GD, Krasteva A, Schneider F, Gulkin D, Gebhard F, Kramer M. Physiotherapy after volar plating of wrist fractures is effective using a home exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.575.
Handoll HH, Madhok R, Howe TE. Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD003324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003324.pub2.
Glasgow C, Tooth LR, Fleming J. Mobilizing the stiff hand: combining theory and evidence to improve clinical outcomes. J Hand Ther. 2010 Oct-Dec;23(4):392-400; quiz 401. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
Schwartz DA. Static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity: a comprehensive literature review. Hand (N Y). 2012 Mar;7(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-011-9380-2. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Masia L, Casadio M, Sandini G, Morasso P. Eye-hand coordination during dynamic visuomotor rotations. PLoS One. 2009 Sep 15;4(9):e7004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007004.
Casadio M, Sanguineti V, Squeri V, Masia L, Morasso P. Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments. Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;202(3):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2175-9. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Masia L, Squeri V, Saha D, Burdet E, Sandini G, Morasso P. Stabilizing unstable object by means of kinematic redundancy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3698-702. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627438.
Squeri V, Masia L, Casadio M, Morasso P, Vergaro E. Force-field compensation in a manual tracking task. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 17;5(6):e11189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011189.
Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Jun;50(6):311-9. No abstract available.
Fairplay T, Atzei A, Corradi M, Luchetti R, Cozzolino R, Schoenhuber R. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation questionnaire. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Nov;37(9):863-70. doi: 10.1177/1753193412445160. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Albanese GA, Taglione E, Gasparini C, Grandi S, Pettinelli F, Sardelli C, Catitti P, Sandini G, Masia L, Zenzeri J. Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00925-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRMINAIL03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.