Shoulder, or Elbow, or Wrist: What Should we Train First After a Stroke?

NCT ID: NCT00453843

Last Updated: 2012-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We will test on persons with chronic impairment due to stroke:

1. whether the order in which robot therapy is delivered influences outcomes (shoulder-and-elbow before wrist vs. wrist before shoulder-and-elbow).
2. whether we should train the shoulder, elbow, and wrist at the same time or on different days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Effect of Proximal and Distal Training on Stroke Recovery:

Specific Aim 1. Test whether task specific wrist robotic training improves motor performance among persons with chronic impairment after stroke.

Specific Aim 2. Test whether the order in which robot therapy is delivered influences outcomes (shoulder-and-elbow before wrist vs. wrist before shoulder-and-elbow).

Specific Aim 3. Test whether there is generalization across different joints (shoulder \& elbow vs wrist).

Specific Aim 4: Test whether there is any interference between training across different joints among persons with chronic impairment after stroke.

Briefly we will invite persons with chronic impairment due to stroke to participate in a study that will train them first on wrist for 6 weeks and then on the shoulder-and-elbow for an additional 6 weeks or vice-versa. A third group will train in alternate days for 12 weeks on the shoulder-and-elbow or the wrist, while a fourth group will be trained on the shoulder, elbow, and wrist on the same day. Outcomes will be measured using standard instruments as well as robot-based measures. We expect that results from this study will provide an objective basis for maximizing this kind of therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Stroke movement therapy robotics rehabilitation robotics shoulder, elbow, wrist

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

proximal to distal training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rehabilitation robotics

Intervention Type DEVICE

sequence of intervention

Movement therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sequence of intervention

distal to proximal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rehabilitation robotics

Intervention Type DEVICE

sequence of intervention

Movement therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sequence of intervention

proximal and distal on alternate days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rehabilitation robotics

Intervention Type DEVICE

sequence of intervention

Movement therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sequence of intervention

proximal and distal same day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rehabilitation robotics

Intervention Type DEVICE

sequence of intervention

Movement therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sequence of intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rehabilitation robotics

sequence of intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Movement therapy

sequence of intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist) InMotion2.0 (InMotion Arm) and InMotion3.0 (InMotion Wrist)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients will be included in the study if they meet the following criteria:

1. naïve subjects who have never experienced robot-assisted therapy as inpatients or outpatients;
2. first single focal unilateral lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that has occurred at least 6 months prior;
3. cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (Mini-Mental Status Score of 22 and higher or interview for aphasic subjects);
4. average Motor Power score \>= 1/5 or \<= 3/5 (neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in 6 muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist);
5. informed written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they have a fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Burke Medical Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hermano I Krebs, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Burke Medical Research Institute

White Plains, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD045343

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link