Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-01
2016-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
All patients, aged between 14 and 40 years, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were prospectively enrolled in this observational study and were divided into two groups: Athletes agonists (Experimental Group or Group A) and women who do not perform agonistic sports (Control Group or Group B). In both groups of patients, the investigators administered two types of questionnaires: a standardized quality of Life questionnaire, validated in Italian (SF-12) and a screening questionnaire recommended by the Female Athlete Triad Expert Panel.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying Periods of High Training Load Considering the Menstrual Cycle Phases in Elite and Non-elite Female Athletes
NCT06377306
Hormonal Status, Performance and Health in Elite Female Athlete
NCT05028959
The Health of Competitive Fitness Athletes
NCT03007459
Impact of Menstrual Cycle-Based Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Female Athletes
NCT06679491
Cycling Through the Menstrual Cycle
NCT06634134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The institutional internal review board approved the study. Inclusion criteria were: I) age between 14 and 40 years; II) absence of malignancies; III) informed consent obtained from the patient; IV) no previous surgical, chemotherapic and/or radiotherapic treatments.
the investigators excluded all patients who presented any conditions that could alter quality of life such as: I) recent traumas; II) recent surgeries; III) oncologic history; IV) uncontrolled systemic illnesses; V) severe or uncontrolled infection; VI) mental illness; VII) pregnancy.
All patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled in this observational study and were divided into two groups: Athletes agonists (Experimental Group or Group A) and women who do not perform any agonistic sports (Control Group or Group B).
Were considered agonists athletes and enrolled in Group A all the patients who met the definition of competitive sports athletes adopted by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ministerial Decree, D.M. 18/02/1982 - Circular No. 7 of 01/31/1983): "form of sporting activity systematically and/or continually practiced, especially organized by the National Sports Federations, the Sporting Promotion bodies recognized both by CONI and the Ministry of Education with regard to the Youth Games at National level, to the achievement of a certain level of sportive performance". All other women were considered as not athletes and were included in the control group (Group B).
To assess the sample size, in order to detect a difference of 3 points in SF12-questionnaires, were used the Cohen formulas, considering a power of 80% (two-tails; P = 0.05 Long Rank Test): 100 patients were necessary for each group to detect a statistically significant difference.
In all patients an accurate gynecological history was recorded with a special focus on menstrual irregularities, from the age of menarche to present. It was also investigated the presence of other gynecological symptoms that can affect athletic performance of the patient, such as pain during menstruation (dysmenorrhea) or other forms of pelvic pain.
A registration of medication history was taken, including medications that can affect menstruation and /or bone mass density (BMD), as contraceptive pills or other contraceptive agents.
Moreover all patients underwent the evaluation of every physical characteristics that could be suggestive of an eating disorders, such as low body mass index (BMI), weight loss, orthostatic hypotension, swelling of the parotid glands or presence of calluses on the proximal interphalangeal joints (also known as Mark Russell). Finally an accurate record of all the previous episodes of bone stress, injuries and fractures was recorded.
In both groups of patients two types of questionnaires were administrated: a standardized quality of Life questionnaire, validated in Italian (SF-12) and a screening questionnaire (the same that the Female Athlete Triad Expert Panel recommends as a screening and an integral part of the athletes routine physical assessment) aimed to the identification of apparatus-specific dysfunctions (Female Athlete Triad). Even if this last questionnaire is still not validated in Italian, both questionnaires (SF-12 and screening) were administered in Italian.
SF-12 questionnaire is considered a reliable measure of perceived health that describes the degree of general physical health status and mental health distress. It consists of 12 items, derived from the physical and mental domains. SF-12 was considered altered if the score was \<40, either from the physical or mental functioning point of view, because means of 50 and standard deviations of 10 are usually achieved in the general population.
The screening questionnaire was focused on those main risk factors that can lead to a decreased quality of life in women and to an early detection of a medical dysfunction related to the female triad. the investigators used two different cut-off to consider the questionnaire altered: 1) alteration of at least two items of the questionnaire; 2) alteration of at least two items of the questionnaire, where question 6,7 and 8 (all related to eating disorders) were considered as one.
If either one of the two questionnaire resulted altered, or would arise any suspicion from the physical evaluation, the patient was sent to a more in-depth assessment in order to verify the presence of a clinical dysfunction.
Finally all the data were recorded in a database. The incidence and prevalence of gynecological disorders were calculated.
Spearman correlation test was used to assess if altered levels of quality of life corresponded to an alteration of the screening questionnaire and if an alteration of the screening questionnaire effectively corresponded, after a more in-depth clinical assessment, to a clinical dysfunction. Correlation coefficients whose magnitude were between 0.9 and 1.0 indicated variables which could be considered very highly correlated. Correlation coefficients whose magnitude were between 0.7 and 0.9 indicated variables which could be considered highly correlated. Correlation coefficients whose magnitude were between 0.5 and 0.7 indicated variables which could be considered moderately correlated. Correlation coefficients whose magnitude were between 0.3 and 0.5 indicated variables which had a low correlation. Correlation coefficients whose magnitude were \<0.3 had little if any (linear) correlation.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and accuracy of the screening questionnaire in assessing the presence of a clinical dysfunction were calculated, using the physical examination as the 'gold standard'. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and accuracy of the screening questionnaire in assessing the presence of an alteration of quality of life were calculated, using SF-12 questionnaire as the 'gold standard'.
All continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. All the variables quantitative were compared using the Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney, depending on their distribution pattern. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chisquare or Fisher tests.
For all statistical comparisons, statistical significance was set at P \<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using software Medcalc © statistical software ver. 12.4.0.0.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Athletes agonists (Experimental Group)
I) age between 14 and 40 years who met the definition of competitive sports athletes adopted by the Italian Ministry of Health II) absence of malignancies; III) informed consent obtained from the patient; IV) no previous surgical, chemotherapic and/or radiotherapic treatments.
We excluded all patients who presented any conditions that could alter quality of life such as: I) recent traumas; II) recent surgeries; III) oncologic history; IV) uncontrolled systemic illnesses; V) severe or uncontrolled infection; VI) mental illness; VII) pregnancy.
QoL questionnaire SF-12 and and a screening questionnaire were requested
QoL questionnaire SF-12 and and a screening questionnaire
patient were asked to fill questionnaires
women not agonists (Control Group)
I) age between 14 and 40 years who did not met the definition of competitive sports athletes adopted by the Italian Ministry of Health; II) absence of malignancies; III) informed consent obtained from the patient; IV) no previous surgical, chemotherapic and/or radiotherapic treatments.
We excluded all patients who presented any conditions that could alter quality of life such as: I) recent traumas; II) recent surgeries; III) oncologic history; IV) uncontrolled systemic illnesses; V) severe or uncontrolled infection; VI) mental illness; VII) pregnancy. QoL questionnaire SF-12 and and a screening questionnaire were requested
QoL questionnaire SF-12 and and a screening questionnaire
patient were asked to fill questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
QoL questionnaire SF-12 and and a screening questionnaire
patient were asked to fill questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. absence of malignancies;
3. informed consent obtained from the patient;
4. no previous surgical, chemotherapic and/or radiotherapic treatments.
Exclusion Criteria
2. recent surgeries;
3. oncologic history;
4. uncontrolled systemic illnesses;
5. severe or uncontrolled infection;
6. mental illness;
7. pregnancy.
14 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federazione medicina sportiva italiana (FMSI)
UNKNOWN
Campus Bio-Medico University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roberto Angioli
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roberto Angioli
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Campus Bio Medico of Rome
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Joy E, De Souza MJ, Nattiv A, Misra M, Williams NI, Mallinson RJ, Gibbs JC, Olmsted M, Goolsby M, Matheson G, Barrack M, Burke L, Drinkwater B, Lebrun C, Loucks AB, Mountjoy M, Nichols J, Borgen JS. 2014 female athlete triad coalition consensus statement on treatment and return to play of the female athlete triad. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):219-32. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000077.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
female athlete triad
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25/15 OSS ComEt CBM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.