Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
49 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-11-30
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specific aims:
* To investigate the effects of EA on energy metabolism
* To investigate the effects of EA on reproductive, vascular- and bone health, and endocrine functions
* To investigate the effects of EA on exercise capacity
* To investigate the effects of EA on neuromuscular performance
* To investigate the effects of EA on recovery after exercise
* To identify potential dietary factors influencing EA, exercise capacity and neuromuscular performance
* To identify potential exercise factors influencing EA, exercise capacity and neuromuscular performance
* To identify potential psychological, behavoural and motivational aspects associated with insufficient EA
The investigators hypothesize that female athletes with insufficient energy availability have attenuated energy metabolism, reduced BMD, impaired endothelial function and decreased ability to recover between exercise bouts compared to matched controls with sufficient energy and nutrient intake. The investigators also hypothesize that EA influences exercise capacity and neuromuscular performance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Energy Availability and Its Impact in Elite Triathletes
NCT07232628
Evaluation of a Practice-oriented Recovery Program for Female Endurance Athletes With Relative Energy Deficiency
NCT04959565
Energy Availability in Male Athletes Across the Season
NCT05259969
The Health of Competitive Fitness Athletes
NCT03007459
Recovery Following Acute Endurance Training
NCT06043492
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data collection was performed on two consecutive days followed by a 7-day registration period in the athletes' normal environment. The first day comprised of examinations involving bone health, blood pressure and reproductive function. The second day included examinations of energy metabolism, aerobic capacity, as well as assessment of eating disorders. The subjects were instructed not to exercise for more than 30 min at low or moderate intensity on the day before, and on the first day of examination, and to arrive at the clinic in a fasted (from midnight) and rested state.
PROTOCOL OVERVIEW:
DAY 1: Start at 7:45 A.M.
1. Pragnancy test
2. Blood sampling
3. DXA scan
4. Blood pressure
5. Meal
6. Gynecological examination
DAY 2: Start at 7 A.M.
1. RMR
2. Blood sampling
3. Work efficiency
4. Meal
5. EDE interview
6. Incremental exercise test
7. EDI-questionnaire
7 DAY DIETARY AND ACTIVITY RECORD
The timing of the examination and registration period was planned individually for each subject in order to choose a period reflecting their habitual food habits and exercise regimes. Dietary intake and training intensity were recorded by the subjects for seven consecutive days to assess current EA. Energy intake was calculated from a prospective weighed (Exido 246030 Kitchen Scale, Gothenburg, Sweden) food record, using a nutrient analysis program, Dankost 2000 (Dankost, Copenhagen, Denmark) for Danish food items, and Dietist XP (Kost och Näringsdata AB, Bromma, Sweden) for Swedish food items. Subjects were given in-depth verbal and written instructions and a demonstration of how food and beverages should be weighed and registered. Subjects were instructed to maintain their normal food habits and eating patterns. Before entering data in the nutrient analysis program the same dietician reviewed all completed diet records and asked for supplementary information if needed, and the mean daily energy intake from the 7-day record was used in the analysis. In order to identify subjects who provided nutritional data of poor validity, the Goldberg cutoff was calculated using the equation described by Black (2000). Heart rate monitors (Polar RS400®, Stockholm, Sweden) and training logs were used to assess exercise energy expenditure. Subjects were instructed to maintain and to follow their normal training regime. They were, furthermore, instructed to describe each session in as much detail as possible, regarding type, duration, and intensity of exercise and to wear the heart rate monitor at all training sessions (except swimming) and during cycling (training as well as transportation).
Eating behavior was assessed using the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-3), a questionnaire assessing behavior and attitudes related to DE behavior, as well as to overt ED. Subjects were categorized as having DE behavior when the EDI risk subscale score for Drive for Thinness (DT) was ≥ 14, and/or a Body Dissatisfaction (BD) risk score ≥ 19 and without the presence of DSM-IV diagnosed ED. The Eating Disorder Examination (EDE-16) was used to determine whether subjects met the criteria for ED, according DSM-IVcriteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and ED not otherwise specified (EDNOS). All interviews were performed by the same EDE-certified member of the research team.
Subjects were transported by car to the clinic on the morning of the second test day in order to minimize physical activity prior to the measurement. RMR was assessed between 7:00 and 8:30 h, after an overnight fast, using a ventilated open hood system (Oxycon Pro 4, Jeager, Germany). The system was automatically calibrated before each test, and again weekly, by an alcohol burning test with coefficients of variability (CV) of 0.7% for O2, 1.1% for CO2, 0.8%for the respiratory exchange ratio, and 2% for EE. After voiding, subjects laid down for 15 min before measurements of oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) over 35 min (the equation is defined under Calculations). Work efficiency was assessed by a standardized test protocol in the fasted state, initiated by the subject seated on the bicycle ergometer (Monark 939E, Monark Exercise AB, Vansbro, Sweden) for 6 min, followed by cycling for 6 min at 0W, 50W and 100W, respectively. An air-tight mask covering the mouth and nose was used in order to measure respiratory gas exchange (the equations for calculations are defined under Calculations). In order to calculate daily total EE, HR monitors (Polar RS400®) were used to assess EE during bicycle transportation, while actigraphy (ActiGraph GT3X®, Pensacola, FL, USA) and the data analysis software ActiLife 5 (ActiGraph) were used for assessment of NEAT. Subjects were instructed to wear an accelerometer on the wrist during sleep, and on the hip from getting up in the morning until bedtime, and only to take it off during showering, swimming, bicycle transportation, and training.
Two hours after a standardized breakfast, an incremental exercise test on the bicycle ergometer was performed, initiated by cycling for 6 min at 50W, followed by an increase in workload of 12-14 W/min until exhaustion. An air-tight mask covering the mouth and nose was used in order to measure VO2peak and respiratory exchange ratio, and HR (Polar RS400®) was measured.
Subjects using hormonal contraceptives were requested to stop for a minimum of 6 weeks prior to examination in order to secure a sufficientwashout period for exogenous estrogen and progesterone. Subjects not recovering their menstrual bleeding within the 6 weeks were contacted monthly by the research team during a follow-up period of a minimum of 3 months before gynecological assessment. Menstruating athletes were examined in the early follicular phase, on the third to fifth day of menstruation. A pregnancy test was performed on arrival at the hospital, and menstrual function was examined by an experienced gynecologist who performed a transvaginal ultrasound examination (Ultrasound Scanner, Class 1 type B, B-K Medical REF TYPE 2202, Bedfordshire, UK). The maximum number of ovarian follicles present in a single plane was counted, and total volume was assessed. Sex hormone status \[estrogen, progesterone, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), sexual hormone binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin, dehydroepiandrosteron sulfate (DHEA-S), androstendion, and total testosterone\] and anamnestic assessment, e.g., age of menarche, previous menstrual irregularities, use of hormonal contraceptives, and number of menstrual cycles during the last year, were recorded using the low EAin females questionnaire (LEAF-Q) (Melin et al., 2014). Subjects were then classified with eumenorrhea (menstrual cycles of 28 days ± 7 days and sex hormones within the normal range); oligomenorrhea (menstrual cycles \> 35 days where other causes than hypothalamic suppression had been ruled out); FHA (either primary: no menarche after 15 years of age, or secondary: absence of at least three consecutive menstrual cycles where other causes than hypothalamic suppression had been ruled out) (Nattiv et al., 2007); other MDs (anatomic defects, hyperprolactinemia or other dysfunctional ovarian conditions); PCOS involving at least two of the following: (a) enlarged ovaries with a volume greater than 10 mL and/or ≥ one ovary demonstrating ≥ 12 follicles in one plane; (b) irregular or absence of bleeding; and (c) elevated androgen level, or otherwise androgen stigmatized.
Body weight was measured with an accuracy of 0.01 kg in underwear on an electronic scale (Lindeltronic 8000, Samhall Lavi AB, Kristianstad, Sweden). Height was measured without shoes and standing with legs together against a wall, using a fixed stadiometer (Hultafors AB, Hultafors, Sweden). After resting in a supine position for 7 min, HR and BP were measured three times (the mean was used) using an electronic sphygmomanometer (Microlife BP A100, Widnau, Switzerland). Hypotension was defined as a systolic BP \< 90 mmHg and/or diastolic BP \< 60 mmHg. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic, Model Discovery 2009, Hologic Inc.,Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine fat-free, fat, and bone mass, respectively. BMD was determined for whole body, lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip. All measurements and scans were performed in the fasted and resting state between 7:30 and 9:00 h, and were assessed by the same technician, and performed on the same scanner. Calibration of the Hologic Discovery 2009 was performed weekly, using a phantom provided by the manufacturer. Subjects were classified as having normal BMD: Z-scores \> -1 in all measured sites, low BMD: Z-score -1 to -2 in at least one site, and osteoporosis: Z-score \< -2 in at least one site together with minimum one secondary risk factor such as low EA, ED and oligomenorrhea/FHA.
Blood samples were drawn following an overnight fast from an antecubital vein on the first as well as on the second day, between 8:30 and 8:50 h, in a rested state.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Female endurance athletes
Female endurance athletes recruited from Swedish and Danish national teams and competitive sport clubs
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Metabolic disorders
* Smoking
* Use of psychopharmaca
* Use of other forms of contraceptives than oral, e.g. hormonal coil or patches
* Serious injury stopping the athlete from training ≥ 2 weeks.
* Diabetes
18 Years
39 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lund University
OTHER
Herlev Hospital
OTHER
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arne Astrup
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anders sjödin, Assoc prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Copenhagen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fertility Clinic Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Human Nutrition
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Lund University
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B285
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.