Conservative Versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets in Critically Ill Children

NCT ID: NCT03040570

Last Updated: 2018-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-04

Study Completion Date

2017-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A feasibility study to determine if it is possible to perform a safe, adequately powered, and affordable multi-centre study in critically ill children comparing current practice of liberal targets for systemic oxygen levels with more conservative targets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Around 19,000 critically ill children are admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICU) each year in the UK. A large number of these children need breathing support, and this is usually provided through an invasive machine called a 'ventilator'. Clinicians make decisions for treatment based on how much oxygen their patient has in their blood (this is called oxygen saturation or oxygenation) and currently the amount of oxygen critically ill children need is not fully understood. This means that some clinicians use a lower oxygen saturation target, and others, a higher target. This may be problematic as research in neonates (babies) and adults has shown that oxygen saturation levels can influence a patient's chance of survival, how long they stay in hospital and healthcare costs.

Response to oxygen is different in babies, children and adults. This means that the results from the neonatal and adult research are unlikely to be valid or applicable in children due to age-related differences. Urgent high quality clinical evidence is therefore needed to inform on the best targets of oxygenation during critical illness in children.

As large clinical trials are expensive to conduct, it is important to demonstrate that a large-scale trial can be done and that the different components of a trial can all work together. Therefore, the Oxy-PICU study is a 'pilot randomised clinical trial' (a smaller version of the trial we would like to conduct) and will test the feasibility and safety of conducting a large scale trial comparing a restrictive oxygen saturation target (88-92%) with a more liberal oxygen saturation target (\>94%). Oxy-PICU will also collect blood and urine samples to allow for in depth study of the biology of the different oxygenation targets.

The pilot trial will take place at three PICUs (two in London and one in Southampton) and aims to include between 115-125 eligible children over six months. Given the emergency nature of these children and the need to provide immediate care, informed consent will be sought after the children are entered into the study (this is known as deferred consent).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Care Hypoxia Pediatric ALL

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conservative oxygenation target

Children in the conservative oxygenation target group receive treatment targeting oxygen saturation values of 88-92%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conservative oxygenation target

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants allocated to the conservative oxygenation target group will receive supplemental oxygen and ventilator settings at the discretion of the treating clinical team with the aim of peripheral oxygen saturations remaining 88-92% (inclusive).

Liberal oxygenation target

Children in the liberal oxygenation target group receive treatment targeting oxygen saturation values of \>94%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Liberal oxygenation target

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants allocated to the liberal oxygenation target group will receive supplemental oxygen and ventilator settings at the discretion of the treating clinical team with the aim of peripheral oxygen saturations remaining \>94%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conservative oxygenation target

Participants allocated to the conservative oxygenation target group will receive supplemental oxygen and ventilator settings at the discretion of the treating clinical team with the aim of peripheral oxygen saturations remaining 88-92% (inclusive).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Liberal oxygenation target

Participants allocated to the liberal oxygenation target group will receive supplemental oxygen and ventilator settings at the discretion of the treating clinical team with the aim of peripheral oxygen saturations remaining \>94%.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* less than 16 years and \> 38 weeks corrected gestational age
* receiving supplemental oxygen for abnormal gas exchange
* emergency admission accepted to a participating paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) requiring mechanical ventilation within first 6 hours of face-to-face contact with PICU staff or transport team

Exclusion Criteria

* recruited to Oxy-PICU in a previous admission
* brain pathology/injury as a primary reason for admission (e.g traumatic brain injury, post-cardiac arrest, stroke, convulsive status epilepticus without aspiration)
* known pulmonary hypertension
* known or suspected sickle cell disease
* known or suspected uncorrected congenital cardiac disease
* End-of-life care plan in place with limitation of resuscitation
* not expected to survive PICU admission
* receiving long-term mechanical ventilation prior to this admission (non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation)
Minimum Eligible Age

39 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southampton

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St Mary's Hospital, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St Mary's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton General Hospital

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jones GAL, Eaton S, Orford M, Ray S, Wiley D, Ramnarayan P, Inwald D, Grocott MPW, Griksaitis M, Pappachan J, O'Neill L, Mouncey PR, Harrison DA, Rowan KM, Peters MJ; Oxy-PICU Investigators of the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG). Randomization to a Liberal Versus Conservative Oxygenation Target: Redox Responses in Critically Ill Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):e137-e146. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003175. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36728001 (View on PubMed)

Peters MJ, Jones GAL, Wiley D, Wulff J, Ramnarayan P, Ray S, Inwald D, Grocott M, Griksaitis M, Pappachan J, O'Neill L, Eaton S, Mouncey PR, Harrison DA, Rowan KM; Oxy-PICU Investigators for the Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group (PICS-SG). Conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children: the randomised multiple-centre pilot Oxy-PICU trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Aug;44(8):1240-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5232-7. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29868973 (View on PubMed)

Jones GAL, Ramnarayan P, Raman S, Inwald D, Grocott MPW, Eaton S, Ray S, Griksaitis MJ, Pappachan J, Wiley D, Mouncey PR, Wulff J, Harrison DA, Rowan KM, Peters MJ; Oxy-PICU Investigators for thePaediatric Intensive Care Society-Study Group (PICS-SG). Protocol for a randomised pilot multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children (Oxy-PICU). BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e019253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019253.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29247112 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15IA35

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry
NCT02989051 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3