Apneic Intubation Critically Ill Children

NCT ID: NCT04890288

Last Updated: 2021-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the actual standard of care of intubation in Swiss pediatric intensive care units vs the use of apneic oxygenation using either high flow or low flow oxygen to prevent hypoxemia and to prolong apnea time during intubation of critically ill children, with the final aim to improve airway management safety at PICUs. Primary study objective: To demonstrate that airway management supported by oxygen supplementation (either HFNC or low flow oxygen) can prevent significant desaturation (SpO2 \> 85%) among patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Randomized controlled multicenter trial in Swiss pediatric ICUs with randomization to 3 groups: 1) standard of care with conventional preoxygenation with bag-mask ventilation vs 2) conventional preoxygenation with bag-mask ventilation and apneic oxygenation with low-flow Oxygen fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 100% 0.2 L/kg/min vs 3) conventional preoxygenation with bag-mask ventilation and apneic oxygenation with THRIVE FiO2 100% 2L/kg/min.

Eligible children meeting the inclusions criteria will be prepared for oral intubation according to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the respective NICU/PICU. SpO2, heart rate, invasive or non-invasive blood pressure values shall be recorded continuously (for invasive continuously and for non-invasive intermittently every 2 minutes and 30 seconds), once the decision to intubate has been made. The sealed envelope for randomization will then be opened. All patients must be intubated orally. The induction will be performed according to the clinical needs of the child. All children will be intubated using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with a Miller or Macintosh-blades (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) age adopted.

Before oral intubation preoxygenation is performed for 2 minutes with a facemask usually used at the study site with an FiO2 of 1.0 and flow rates of 6-10L/min in all groups. After induction, all patients will be paralyzed with an age appropriate dose of muscle relaxant to ensure apnoea. The dose of the neuromuscular blocking agent and the depth of the anesthesia shall be adjusted according to clinical parameters such as absent reactions to jaw thrust and normocardia. In all groups, after induction, bag-mask ventilation with 100% oxygen and flow rates of 6-10 Lmin-1 will be continued for about 45-60 seconds until apnea sets in. Thereafter bag-mask ventilation will be stopped and one of the three study interventions will be applied according to randomization:

Control group: When apnea sets in, deep laryngoscopy and endotracheal oral intubation are performed without apneic oxygenation.

Intervention group - high flow: Prior to the introduction of the laryngoscope, apneic oxygenation is commenced with a high-flow nasal cannula flow rate of 2L/kg/min using OptiFlow system at an FiO2 of 1.0. After starting THRIVE laryngoscopy and tracheal oral intubation is performed.

Intervention group - low flow: Prior to the introduction of the laryngoscope, the administration of low-flow oxygen (0.2 l/kg/min) will take place via conventional neonatal nasal cannula (Intersurgical, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom). After starting low-flow oxygen laryngoscopy and tracheal oral intubation is performed.

A chest x-ray, which is a routine procedure, shall be performed at the conclusion of the procedure to verify the endotracheal tube (ETT) position and rule out a pneumothorax.

Study termination criteria constitute successful intubation or the occurrence of a "Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate" emergency. A maximum of 4 intubation attempts in total may be performed. The last intubation attempt must be performed by the most experienced physician in the room. Additional devices like stylet, bougie, etc, can be used at any stage of the intubation process. If the intubation remains unsuccessful the difficult airway algorithm will be followed and a supraglottic airway device (SAD) device will be inserted. Unsuccessful intubation requiring a SAD will lead to immediate study termination. Equipment malfunction (e.g. HFNC, C-MAC VL) will lead to study cessation. In the event of an unexpected difficult intubation, the difficult airway algorithm will be followed.

Intervention group - High flow: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen 2L/kg/min using OptiFlow system by Fisher\&Paykel and an oxygen inspiration concentration FiO2 of 1.0; enabling apneic oxygenation during laryngoscopy.

Picture showing nasal prongs for high-flow oxygen. Intervention group - Low flow: Low-flow oxygen (100%, 0.2 l/kg/min) via conventional neonatal nasal cannula (Intersurgical, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom) enabling apneic oxygenation during laryngoscopy.

Conventionally practiced standard of care with preoxygenation with facemask with an FiO2 of 1.0, followed by bag mask ventilation after induction before oral intubation without apneic oxygenation.

The investigators will include 210 patients, 70 per group. Assuming a desaturation rate of 40% in the control group and a desaturation rate of max 15% with low-flow oxygen and HFNC, aiming at a power of 80% and setting an alpha-level at 0.025 the investigators would need n=56 patients per group. Accounting for some drop-outs, they seek to enroll n=70 patients per group, i.e. a total of n=210 patients.

In pilot studies to this protocol and in recent published data a maximum desaturation of 10% was observed during intubation for both therapies.

The difference in desaturation rate between the 2 intervention groups will be analyzed for non-inferiority.

Assuming a desaturation rate of 85% with HFNC and desaturation rate of 85 % with low-flow oxygen, aiming at a power of 80% and setting an alpha-level at 0.025 (one-sided non-inferiority trial), with a non-inferiority limit of 17% the investigators would need n=70 patients per group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group - High flow

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen 2L/kg/min using OptiFlow system by Fisher\&Paykel and an oxygen inspiration concentration FiO2 of 1.0; enabling apneic oxygenation during laryngoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interventional randomized controled trial (RCT) comparing two oxygenation methods to reduce desaturation during intubation vs standard of care.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Demonstrate that airway management supported by oxygen supplementation (either HFNC or low flow oxygen) can prevent significant desaturation (SpO2 \> 85%) among patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

Intervention group - Low flow:

Low-flow oxygen (100%, 0.2 l/kg/min) via conventional neonatal nasal cannula (Intersurgical, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom) enabling apneic oxygenation during laryngoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interventional randomized controled trial (RCT) comparing two oxygenation methods to reduce desaturation during intubation vs standard of care.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Demonstrate that airway management supported by oxygen supplementation (either HFNC or low flow oxygen) can prevent significant desaturation (SpO2 \> 85%) among patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

Conventional

Conventionally practiced standard of care with preoxygenation with facemask with an FiO2 of 1.0, followed by bag mask ventilation after induction before oral intubation without apneic oxygenation.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interventional randomized controled trial (RCT) comparing two oxygenation methods to reduce desaturation during intubation vs standard of care.

Demonstrate that airway management supported by oxygen supplementation (either HFNC or low flow oxygen) can prevent significant desaturation (SpO2 \> 85%) among patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pediatric patients requiring intubation in the pediatric intensive care unit
* Aged from 37 weeks corrected gestational age to 6 years
* Legal guardians providing written informed consent before the intervention or delayed consent in the event that emergency intubation is required

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with known or suspected difficult/airways
* Congenital heart disease mandating FiO2 \< 1.0, warranting inhalational induction, requiring ongoing CPR or advanced life support due to respiratory arrest
* Preterm age \< 37 0/7 weeks
* Patients who cannot be intubated orally
* Respiratory insufficiency with an SpO2 saturation \< 90 % after 2 min of preoxygenation with FiO2 = 1.0
* Newborns requiring surfactant within the first 3 days of life
* Document stating intent to reject participation in research projects or refusal of intubation or refusal of resuscitation measures
Minimum Eligible Age

37 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

State Hospital, St. Gallen

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Luzerner Kantonsspital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kantonsspital Graubuenden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Riva, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Berne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

EOC

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Inselspital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

HUG

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Luzern

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kinderspital

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kinderspital

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Francis F Ulmer, MD

Role: CONTACT

+41316325265

Thomas Riva, MD

Role: CONTACT

+41316321709

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-02609

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry
NCT02989051 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
CPAP Versus NPPV in ACPE
NCT00446498 COMPLETED PHASE4